Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal

82 ITD 85Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2002#368 most cited

What is Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal authority for?

Evidence corroborating entries of payments or loan/interest advancements found in seized material from a third party must specifically show the actual transfer of money from the third party to the recipient to be admissible.

237

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,368 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal · 82 ITD 85 · section 132 · section 153A · seized material · third party evidence · corroboration of entries · onus of proof · actual transfer of money · cash credits

Sections most often in play

Section 153ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 292CSection 132(4)Section 132(4A)Section 69Section 142(1)

Issues it is cited on

buyback of shareshundi transactionsection 23(3)section 132(4a)dumb documentssection 292csection 158bbsection 158b(b)third party informationonus of proofsection 65bsection 269t

Judgments citing Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal

The ACIT, (Central)-1, Indore vs. M/S. Prakash Ashphlting & Toll Highway Ltd., Indore

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 794/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

The ACIT, (Central)-1, Indore vs. M/S. Prakash Ashphlting & Toll Highway Ltd., Indore

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 793/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

ACIT(Central)-1, Indore vs. Shri Punit Agrawal, Mhow

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 791/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

ACIT(Central)-1, Indore vs. Shri Punit Agrawal, Mhow

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 790/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

ACIT(Central)-1, Indore vs. Shri Punit Agrawal, Mhow

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 789/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

ACIT(Central)-1, Indore vs. Shri Punit Agrawal, Mhow

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 788/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

ACIT(Central)-1, Indore vs. Shri Punit Agrawal, Mhow

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 787/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shrib.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

…on 158BB. (iii) Deletion of additions made by Tribunal of assumed undeclared payments made for purchase of property was on basis of facts. Ashwani Kumar V. ITO (1991) 39 ITD 183 (Del) and Daya Chand V. CIT (2001) 250 ITR 327 (Del) and S.P. Goel V. DCIT (2002) 82 ITD 85 (Mum.): Nine out of 19 slips found were without any name or amount and therefore were dumb documents and no adverse inference could be drawn. Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Union of India - 30 ITJ 197 (SC): In this case, the Hon'ble Court held that without any independent evidence or corroborative material, no addition is permissible on th…

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S Appu Food Products, Cuddalore Chennai

ITA 667/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 &2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Food Products, Tax, V. K-1, Sidco Industrial Estates, Central Circle 2(1), Vadalur, Cuddalore – 607 303. Room No. B3, Ground Floor, [Pan: Aabfa-1499-G] Investigation Building, Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

…7] 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties vs ACIT [2018] :-24-: ITA. Nos: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & CO Nos: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 169 ITD 35 (ITAT Mumbai), DCIT vs Vipin Aggarwal [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 6 (ITAT Chandigarh), S.P Goyal vs DCIT [2002] 82 ITD 85 TM ITAT, T.S. Venkatesan vs ACIT [2000] 74 ITD 298 (Cal) and Monga Metals (P) Ltd vs ACIT [2000] 67 TTJ 247 (All). 12. The ld. DR, has strongly argued in light of ground no. 2.3 of revenue that contents of excel sheets refers the name of “Appu” which clearly shows unaccounted cash transactions of the assessee with Christy group of companies. In th…

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S. Appu Direct Pvt. Ltd., Cuddalore

ITA 666/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 665 & 666/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 37 & 38/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Direct Pvt Ltd., Tax, V. S.No. 544/4A, 4B Opposite To Central Circle 2(1), National College, Kumbakonam, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, Panruti, Cuddalore – 607 103. Investigation Building, [Pan: Aawcs-9382-A] Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

…een reiterated in several decision, like MM Financiers (P) Ltd vs DCIT [2007] 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties vs ACIT [2018] 169 ITD 35 (ITAT Mumbai), DCIT vs Vipin Aggarwal [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 6 (ITAT Chandigarh), S.P Goyal vs DCIT [2002] 82 ITD 85 TM ITAT, T.S. Venkatesan vs ACIT [2000] 74 ITD 298 (Cal) and Monga Metals (P) Ltd vs ACIT [2000] 67 TTJ 247 (All). :-24-: ITA. Nos: 665 & 666/Chny/2023 & CO Nos: 37 & 38/Chny/2023 12. The ld. DR, has strongly argued in light of ground no. 2.3 of revenue that contents of excel sheets refers the name of “Appu” which clearly shows unaccounted cash tr…

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S. Appu Direct Pvt. Ltd., Cuddalore

ITA 665/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 665 & 666/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 37 & 38/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Direct Pvt Ltd., Tax, V. S.No. 544/4A, 4B Opposite To Central Circle 2(1), National College, Kumbakonam, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, Panruti, Cuddalore – 607 103. Investigation Building, [Pan: Aawcs-9382-A] Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

…een reiterated in several decision, like MM Financiers (P) Ltd vs DCIT [2007] 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties vs ACIT [2018] 169 ITD 35 (ITAT Mumbai), DCIT vs Vipin Aggarwal [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 6 (ITAT Chandigarh), S.P Goyal vs DCIT [2002] 82 ITD 85 TM ITAT, T.S. Venkatesan vs ACIT [2000] 74 ITD 298 (Cal) and Monga Metals (P) Ltd vs ACIT [2000] 67 TTJ 247 (All). :-24-: ITA. Nos: 665 & 666/Chny/2023 & CO Nos: 37 & 38/Chny/2023 12. The ld. DR, has strongly argued in light of ground no. 2.3 of revenue that contents of excel sheets refers the name of “Appu” which clearly shows unaccounted cash tr…

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S Appu Food Products, Cuddalore Chennai

ITA 664/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 &2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Food Products, Tax, V. K-1, Sidco Industrial Estates, Central Circle 2(1), Vadalur, Cuddalore – 607 303. Room No. B3, Ground Floor, [Pan: Aabfa-1499-G] Investigation Building, Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

…7] 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties vs ACIT [2018] :-24-: ITA. Nos: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & CO Nos: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 169 ITD 35 (ITAT Mumbai), DCIT vs Vipin Aggarwal [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 6 (ITAT Chandigarh), S.P Goyal vs DCIT [2002] 82 ITD 85 TM ITAT, T.S. Venkatesan vs ACIT [2000] 74 ITD 298 (Cal) and Monga Metals (P) Ltd vs ACIT [2000] 67 TTJ 247 (All). 12. The ld. DR, has strongly argued in light of ground no. 2.3 of revenue that contents of excel sheets refers the name of “Appu” which clearly shows unaccounted cash transactions of the assessee with Christy group of companies. In th…

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S Appu Food Products, Cuddalore Chennai

ITA 663/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 &2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Food Products, Tax, V. K-1, Sidco Industrial Estates, Central Circle 2(1), Vadalur, Cuddalore – 607 303. Room No. B3, Ground Floor, [Pan: Aabfa-1499-G] Investigation Building, Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

…7] 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties vs ACIT [2018] :-24-: ITA. Nos: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & CO Nos: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 169 ITD 35 (ITAT Mumbai), DCIT vs Vipin Aggarwal [2017] 83 Taxmann.com 6 (ITAT Chandigarh), S.P Goyal vs DCIT [2002] 82 ITD 85 TM ITAT, T.S. Venkatesan vs ACIT [2000] 74 ITD 298 (Cal) and Monga Metals (P) Ltd vs ACIT [2000] 67 TTJ 247 (All). 12. The ld. DR, has strongly argued in light of ground no. 2.3 of revenue that contents of excel sheets refers the name of “Appu” which clearly shows unaccounted cash transactions of the assessee with Christy group of companies. In th…

M/S Madhupala Estates Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Circle-16(2), Hyderabad

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2078/HYD/2011[2006-07]Status: HeardITAT Hyderabad12 Dec 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2006-07 Madhupala Estates (P) Ltd Vs. Dy. Cit Hyderabad Circle 16(2) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaccm3943R Assessee By: Shri A Srinivas, Ca Revenue By: Shri Shakeer Ahmed, Dr

For Appellant: Shri A Srinivas, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahmed, DR
Section 40Section 69

…by the assessee. The AR further submitted that these additions were made on the basis of scribble/documents found during the course of search and for the above said purpose, the AR relied upon the decision in the case of 3rd Member case in SP Goyal vs. DCIT (82 ITD 85) at Para No.13 at page 14, it was held as under: “13. Secondly, the assessee has been explaining that the entries at p. 37 are in the nature of planning. The loose paper is torn out of 15th Nov., 1992. The entry of the date is 26th Sept., 1992. As on the year ending on 31st March, 1992, the assessee filed the wealth-tax return for the asst. yr. 19…

DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi vs. Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 59/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi vs. Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 58/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi vs. Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 57/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

Opg Securities Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 1824/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

Opg Securities Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 1823/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

Opg Securities Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, CC-8, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 1822/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…

Opg Securities Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT- CC-8, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 1821/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1818/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1819/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1820/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 1821/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Ita No. 1822/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 1823/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 1824/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 1204/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1205/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 1206/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, E-24, Preet Vihar, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Ita No. 57/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Ita No. 58/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Ita No. 59/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Dcit, Vs Opg Securities Pvt. Ltd., 1St Floor, 4/10, Asaf Ali Road, Central Circle-8, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco1081C Assessee By : Sh. Akshat Jain, Ca & Sh. Rajat Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.10.2023

For Appellant: Sh. Akshat Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Subhra J. Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 65BSection 69ASection 69C

…jit Singh Bakshi (HUF) vs. ACIT: 86 ITD 13 (Del TM) e) ShankerlalNebnumal (HUF) V. DC1T: 80 TTJ 69 (Ahd.) f) Gujarat High Court in the case of DCIT V. Jivanlal Nebhumal (HUF):182 CTR370 g) Kences Foundation (P) Limited: 289 ITR 509 (Mad) h) SP Goval vs. DCIT. 82 ITD 85 (Mum.) (TM) i) Nem Chand Dagar v. ACIT: [2004] 1 SOT 515 (Del) j) Dinesh K. Shah: 92 TTJ 109 (Bang.) k) Ramesh K. Shah v. DCIT: 82 TTJ 827 (Bang.) l) Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of T.S.Venkatesan v. Asst. CIT: 74 ITD 298 m) Atul Kumar Jain vs. DCIT: 64 TTJ 786 ITA No. 1818 to 1824/Del/2021 OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. n) Delhi Bench of…