MTR Maiya’s v. ITO
152 Taxmann.com 189Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2023#8208 most cited
What is MTR Maiya’s v. ITO authority for?
An Assessing Officer must verify facts and decide the quantum of disallowance under section 36(1)(va) when the matter is remanded by the CIT(A). The issue of employee contributions to EPF/ESI remitted after the due date for filing the return under section 139(1) but before the due date for filing the return under the respective Acts, is settled by the Supreme Court in Checkmate Services (P) Ltd.
13
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.
Also referred to as
MTR Maiya's v. ITO · section 36(1)(va) · section 143(1) · section 139(1) · CIT(A) remand · Assessing Officer verification · EPF ESI employee contribution · belated payment