Ms. Sonali Dharmendra Mhatre v. ITO

Santosh Kumar Shukla, Lucknow vs. Assessment Unit, NFAC

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2015-16 Santosh Kumar Shukla V. The Assessment Unit 11A/141, Vrindavan Colony Nfac Lucknow (U.P) Tan/Pan:Bawps5372J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shalabh Singh, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Amit Kumar, D.R. O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 12.03.2025 Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Was An Employee Of Planning Research & Action Division Of State Planning Institute, Since 1993. The Case Of The Assessee Was Reopened Under Section 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act’) After Issuing Notice Under Section 148A(B) Of The Act, Vide Dated 16.03.2022 For The Reason That The Assessee Had Made Cash Deposits/Time Deposits In His Bank Account. In Response To Notice Under Section Under Section 148 Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration On 29.04.2022, Declaring A Total Income Of

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 Santosh Kumar Shukla v. The Assessment Unit 11A/141, Vrindavan Colony NFAC Lucknow (U.P) TAN/PAN:BAWPS5372J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Shalabh Singh, Advocate Respondent by: Shri Amit Kumar, D.R. O R D E R This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 12.03.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee was an employee of Planning Research and…