JOYCE STANISLAUS ARANHA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 10(1)(3), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 4194/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeassessment Year 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Ashok BansalFor Respondent: Shri Asif Karmali, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54F
…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “J”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year 2017-18 Joyce Stanislaus Aranha ITO, Ward – 10(1)(3), Aaykar Bhavan, E 1301, Mayfair Meridian, Mumbai – 400058. Vs. Ceasar Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400102. PAN: AAFPA 5598 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Ashok Bansal Revenue by : Shri Asif Karmali, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 14.01.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 21.03.2025 O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The appeal of the assessee for the assessment y…