Mohammed Ali v. ITO

65 Taxmann.com 189High Court2016#9855 most cited

What is Mohammed Ali v. ITO authority for?

Disallowance under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding the prescribed limit can lead to increased taxable income and tax liability, satisfying the conditions for revision under section 263(1).

11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2024.

Also referred to as

N. Mohammed Ali v. ITO · 65 Taxmann.com 189 · section 40A(3) · section 263(1) · business expediency · cash payment · taxable income · tax liability · revisionary powers

Judgments citing Mohammed Ali v. ITO

Sivakarthikeyan Transports, Karur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2 Karur, Karur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 970/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.970/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sivakarthikeyan Transports, The Income Tax Officer, 23, Pasuapthypuram, Vs. Ward-2, Karur – 639001. Karur. Tamil Nadu. [Pan: Aaias 3396N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.09.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per S.R. Raghunatha, A.M : This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [Nfac], Delhi [Hereinafter “Cit(A)] In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1054458891(1), Dated 19.07.2023. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: (A) The Order Passed By The Learned Cit(A) Is Against The Probabilities & Evidence Of Facts Put Forth Before It & Also Contrary To Settled Principles With Regard To The Law On Taxation. :- 2 -:

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 40Section 40ASection 40A(3)

…Act is contrary to the law as there is a proviso, which gives exceptions of cash payment beyond the limit fixed under section 40A(3). The Ld.AR drew our attention to the decision of the Hon’ble High court of Madras in the case of N.Mohammed ali Vs. ITO [2016] 65 Taxmann.com 189(Mad), even though the decision was held in favour of revenue in respect of section 40A(3), their lordships has discussed the question of business expediency to make the payment in cash. The relevant extract is given below: “18. Question No.4:- The fourth question revolves around business expediency. This question has arisen for considerati…

B.Dhanasekaran, Chennai vs. ACIT, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 365/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.365/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri R. Dhanasekaran, The Assistant Commissioner Of R-3, Tnhb Shopping Complex, Vs. Income Tax, Shastri Nagar, 1St Avenue, Adyar, Non Corporate Circle – 15(1), Chennai 600 020. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Adxpd7168E] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N. Devanathan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri J. Pavitran Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 17.09.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.10.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri N. Devanathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J. Pavitran Kumar, JCIT
Section 40A(3)Section 80Section 80I

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी धु"ु" आर.एल रे"ी, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस जयरामन, लेखा सद" के सम" Before Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member & Shri S. Jayaraman, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.365/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri R. Dhanasekaran, The Assistant Commissioner of R-3, TNHB Shopping Complex, Vs. Income Tax, Shastri Nagar, 1st Avenue, Adyar, Non Corporate Circle – 15(1), Chennai 600 020. Chennai 600 034. [PAN: ADXPD7168E] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri N. Devanatha…

Mohammed Ali v. ITO (65 Taxmann.com 189) — Cited in 11 Judgments | BharatTax