Merinoply & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT

209 ITR 508High Court1994#2703 most cited

What is Merinoply & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Transport subsidies received by a business operating in a backward area, being inseparably connected with the ongoing business and incidental to its expenditure, constitute a revenue or trading receipt taxable under the Income Tax Act.

43

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Merinoply & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT · 209 ITR 508 · Section 2(24) Income Tax Act · Section 28 Income Tax Act · taxability of subsidies · revenue receipt · capital receipt · trading receipt · transport subsidy · incentive scheme · backward area

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Merinoply & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT

DCIT, Chennai vs. Arjun Chemicals Private Ltd., Chengalput

In the result the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1270/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. : 1268, 1269 & 1270/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, V. Ii Floor, 149 Velachery-Tambaram Company Circle –I(1), High Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai – 34. Chennai - 600 100. Pan : Aaaca5195M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Shiva Srinivas, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate
Section 80I

…o neutralize the incidence of customs duty payment on the import content of the export product which is provided for by credit to customs duty against the export product. Referring to the judgment of Calcutta High Court in Merino Ply & Chemicals Ltd v CIT, 209 ITR 508 [1994], the Apex court found that the Calcutta judgment, the legal provisions of the Income Tax Act has been correctly appreciated. In fact, the observation made by the Calcutta High Court was reproduced by the Apex Court. The Calcutta High Court in fact found that transport subsidiary is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Arjun Chemicals Private Ltd., Chengalput

In the result the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1269/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. : 1268, 1269 & 1270/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, V. Ii Floor, 149 Velachery-Tambaram Company Circle –I(1), High Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai – 34. Chennai - 600 100. Pan : Aaaca5195M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Shiva Srinivas, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate
Section 80I

…o neutralize the incidence of customs duty payment on the import content of the export product which is provided for by credit to customs duty against the export product. Referring to the judgment of Calcutta High Court in Merino Ply & Chemicals Ltd v CIT, 209 ITR 508 [1994], the Apex court found that the Calcutta judgment, the legal provisions of the Income Tax Act has been correctly appreciated. In fact, the observation made by the Calcutta High Court was reproduced by the Apex Court. The Calcutta High Court in fact found that transport subsidiary is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Arjun Chemicals Private Ltd., Chengalput

In the result the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1268/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. : 1268, 1269 & 1270/Mds/2014 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, V. Ii Floor, 149 Velachery-Tambaram Company Circle –I(1), High Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai – 34. Chennai - 600 100. Pan : Aaaca5195M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Shiva Srinivas, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Ramamurthy, Advocate
Section 80I

…o neutralize the incidence of customs duty payment on the import content of the export product which is provided for by credit to customs duty against the export product. Referring to the judgment of Calcutta High Court in Merino Ply & Chemicals Ltd v CIT, 209 ITR 508 [1994], the Apex court found that the Calcutta judgment, the legal provisions of the Income Tax Act has been correctly appreciated. In fact, the observation made by the Calcutta High Court was reproduced by the Apex Court. The Calcutta High Court in fact found that transport subsidiary is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the…

M/S. Nanda Mint & Pine Chemicals Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6172/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. Nanda Mint & Pine Vs. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chemicals Ltd., 1/10, Munshi Circle-13(1), New Delhi Niketan, Asaf Ali Road, Near Kamala Market, New Delhi Gir/Pan : Aaccn0965G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By S/Sh. K. Sampath & Raj Kumar, Advocates Respondent By Sh. P. Dam Kanunjna, Sr.Dr & Assessment Year: 2008-09 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nanda Mint & Pine Chemicals Tax, Circle-13(1), Room No. 406, Ltd., 1/10, Munshi Niketan, Asaf Ali C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Road, Near Kamala Market, New Delhi Delhi Gir/Pan : Aaccn0965G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Smt. Parmita M. Biswas, Cit(Dr) Respondent By S/Sh. K. Sampath & Raj Kumar, Advocates Date Of Hearing 09.03.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 08.04.2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: These Two Appeals Of The Revenue & The Assessee Are Preferred Against Two Separate Orders Dated 08.07.2011 & 14.11.2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax( Appeals)-Xvi, New Delhi For Assessment Year 2008-09 & 2009- Ays: 2008-09 & 2009-10 10 Respectively. Since The Common Issue Of Deduction Under Section 80Ib Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 Is Involved In Both The Appeals, These Appeals Are Heard Together & Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order.

Section 143(2)Section 80Section 80I

…duty against the export product. In such a scenario, it cannot be said that such duty exemption scheme is derived from profits and gains made by the industrial undertaking or business itself. 21. The Calcutta High Court in Merino Ply & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT, 209 ITR 508 [1994], held that transport subsidies were inseparably connected with the business carried on by the assessee. In that case, the Division Bench held:- "We do not find any perversity in the Tribunal's finding that the scheme of transport subsidies is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the assessee. It is a fact that the assessee…