Mega Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT

155 ITD 1019Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2015#4878 most cited

What is Mega Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

An assessment order passed without a valid order of transfer under Section 120(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is void and without jurisdiction.

24

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Mega Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT · Section 120(4)(b) · Section 127 · assessment order · jurisdiction · void assessment · Assistant Commissioner · Joint Commissioner · Chief Commissioner

Sections most often in play

Section 127Section 120(4)(b)Section 143(3)Section 124(3)Section 2(7A)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144

Issues it is cited on

section 120(4)(b)section 2(7a)section 120(1)section 124(3)section 120section 124assistant directorsection 127chief commissionersection 132asection 144c(13)dispute resolution panel

Judgments citing Mega Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT

HANEEF AKBAR BASHA,VELLORE vs. ITO WARD 2, THIRUVANNAMALAI, THIRUVANNAMALAI

ITA 2388/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
Section 127Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 154

…9 SC] 1-4 2 KIRAN SINGH Vs CHAMAN PASWAN [1954 AIR 340 SC] 5-14 Without an order of transfer u/s.127 assessment order is void 3 Mega Corporation Ltd. VS. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Range -6, New Delhi [2015] 62 taxmann.com 351 (Delhi Trib.)/[2015] 155 ITD 1019 (Delhi - Trib.)[22-09- 2015] 15-32 :: 5 :: ITA No 2388/Chny/2025 (AY 2017-18) Haneef Akbar Basha (Vs.) ITO ward-2, Tiruvannamalai 4 Nagindas Kasturchand and Bros. vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-3 [2022] 138 taxmann.com 365 (Gujarat)/[2022] 288 Taxman 66 (Gujarat)/[2022] 445 ITR 50 (Gujarat)[11-04- 2022] 33-62 5 Noorul Islam Educational…

ACIT - 14(2) (2), MUMBAI vs. PFIZER LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1497/MUM/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal (Jm) & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara (Am) Acit-14(2)(2) M/S. Pfizer Limited 461, 4Th Floor The Capital, 802/1901 Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Plot No. C-70, G Block M.K. Road Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai-400 020. Bandra East, Mumbai 400 0051. Pan : Aaacp3334M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Nihar Ranjan SamalFor Respondent: Shri Vishal Kalra

…and hence liable to be quashed, contended by Ld. AR of the appellant company in this cross objection. Further the appellant company has relied on the decisions of Mumbai Tribunal in the cases of DCIT Vs. Tata Communications Ltd., Mega Corporation Ld. Vs. ACIT 155 ITD 1019, Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. ACIT and Tata Sons Ltd. Vs. ACIT for the proposition that the subject legal issue is squarely covered in appellant favour and hence the assessment order passed by the Ld. AO lacks jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. 15. Per contra, Ld. DR filed a written submission dated 18.2.2025, in which it was stated that the…

DOLPHIN PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS,RAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 58/RPR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 58/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal & Vimal KumarFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 68Section 801B(10)

…had observed, that Jt. CIT/Addl. CIT cannot validly assume jurisdiction and pass an assessment order in absence of an order u/s. 120(4)(b) of the Act. Also, a similar view had been taken by the ITAT, Delhi in the case of Mega Corporation Ltd. vs. ACIT, [2015] 155 ITD 1019. Also, ITAT, Mumbai in the case of Tata Sons Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-2(3), ITA Nos. 4497 & 4542/Mum/2005 had, inter alia, held that Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax can perform functions and exercise powers of an Assessing Officer only if he is specially directed u/s. 120(4)(b) of the Act. For the sake of clarity, the observations of the Tribunal…

ITO (IT) TDS-2, MUMBAI vs. TATA STEEL LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed, while the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 225/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: FixedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri J. D. Mistry a/wFor Respondent: Shri P. C. Chhotaray
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…n why the assessee participated in all the assessment proceedings. The learned DR further submitted that the assessee filed the aforesaid additional grounds on the basis of the decision of the coordinate bench in Mega Corporation Ltd v/s the Addl. CIT, [2015] 155 ITD 1019 (Del.), Tata Steel Ltd. ITA no.225/Mum./2014 ITA no.8707/Mum./2011 which has been reversed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, and thus the additional grounds raised by the assessee are without any basis. 7. In rebuttal, the learned Sr. Counsel submitted that mere admission of appeal cannot alter the decision rendered by the Tribunal, as there is…

TATA STEEL LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed, while the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 8707/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri J. D. Mistry a/wFor Respondent: Shri P. C. Chhotaray
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)

…n why the assessee participated in all the assessment proceedings. The learned DR further submitted that the assessee filed the aforesaid additional grounds on the basis of the decision of the coordinate bench in Mega Corporation Ltd v/s the Addl. CIT, [2015] 155 ITD 1019 (Del.), Tata Steel Ltd. ITA no.225/Mum./2014 ITA no.8707/Mum./2011 which has been reversed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, and thus the additional grounds raised by the assessee are without any basis. 7. In rebuttal, the learned Sr. Counsel submitted that mere admission of appeal cannot alter the decision rendered by the Tribunal, as there is…

ADDL CIT R G 7(1), MUMBAI vs. NOVARTIS INDIA LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS HINDUSTAN CIBA GIEGY LTD. ), MUMBAI

ITA 6772/MUM/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Mar 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blem/S. Novartis India Limited V. Asst. Commissioner Of Income –Tax - 7(2)(2) {Earlier Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1)} 6Th& 7Th Floor 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan Inspire Bkc M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 “G” Block, Bkc Main Road Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E) Mumbai – 400051 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent) Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1) V. M/S. Novartis India Limited Room No. 622, Aayakar Bhavan {Earlier Known As Hindustan Ciba Giegy Ltd.,} Sandoz House, Dr. A.B. Road M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 Worli, Mumbai – 400018 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No.190/Mum/2011 [Arising Out Of Ita No.6772/Mum/2010 (A.Y. 2002-03)] M/S. Novartis India Limited V. Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1)} Room No. 622, Aayakar Bhavan {Earlier Known As Hindustan Ciba Giegy Ltd.,} Sandoz House, Dr. A.B. Road M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 Worli, Mumbai – 400018 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M/s. Novartis India Limited v. Asst. Commissioner of Income –Tax - 7(2)(2) {Earlier Addl. Commissioner of Income –Tax – 7(1)} 6th& 7th Floor 1st Floor, Aayakar Bhavan Inspire BKC M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 “G” Block, BKC Main Road Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E) Mumbai – 400051 PAN: AAACH2914F (Appellant) (Respondent) Addl. Commissioner of Income –Tax – 7(1) v. M/s. Novartis India Limited Room No. 622, Aayakar Bhavan {Earlier Known as Hindustan Ciba G…

M/S. REGIONAL OILSEEDS GROWERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNION LIMITED,CHITRADURGA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DAVANGERE

ITA 1355/BANG/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 120(4)(b)Section 143(2)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…iction cannot exercise such a concurrent jurisdiction. The decision of the Hon'ble High Court in Valvoline squarely applies to the facts of the present case. 4.3 It is further submitted that the Hon'ble Delhi Tribunal in Mega Corporation Ltd v. Additional CIT 155 ITD 1019 has clearly held that in absence of order u/s. 120(4)(b) of the Act, the Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax lacks jurisdiction to exercise the functions of the assessing officer and therefore, the order of assessment is framed without jurisdiction. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced below; 7.1 On careful consideration we find…

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.,HISAR vs. JCIT, HISAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 619/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambledr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Surenderpal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 254Section 92C

…s and functions in relation to the said person or class of persons shall be such authority as may be specified in the notification.” 30. The Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT Delhi Benches in the case of Mega Corporation Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT, Range-6, New Delhi [2015] 155 ITD 1019 (Delhi-Trib.) in which it was held as under: “Additional Commissioner of Income Tax can perform functions and, exercise powers of an Assessing Officer 32 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. only if he is specifically directed under section 120(4)(b).” 31. According to Section 120(1) and (2) of the I.T. Act, the Board may assign to Income Tax Authorities…

THE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 8570/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 May 2021AY 2007-08
Section 115JSection 120Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…sing Officer and it is not in respect of Addl. CIT or Addl. DIT. Thus, none of these notifications can validly authorize or empower the Addl. CIT, Range-1(3) to act as an Assessing Officer in the present case. In case of Mega Corporation Ltd. vs. ACIT, [2015] 155 ITD 1019, the Tribunal while deciding identical issue of exercise of powers and functions of Assessing Officer by Addl. CIT dealt with the aforesaid notifications relied upon by the learned Departmental Representative and following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Valvoline Cummins v/s DCIT, [2008] 307 FUR 103 (Del) held that without a not…

ADDL CIT 2(3), MUMBAI vs. TATA SONS LTD, MUMBAI

Appeal is partly allowed and the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 4893/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti Vissanji, ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, CIT-DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. A.Y. Appellant Respondent 4893/Mum/12 2006-07 M/s. Tata Sons Ltd., ACIT-2(3) Bombay House, MUMBAI 24, Homi Mody Street, Fort, 2545/Mum/12 2007-08 MUMBAI [PAN: AAACT4060A] M/s. Tata Sons Ltd., 4543/Mum/12 2006-07 Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody ACIT-2(3) Street, MUMBAI Fort, MUMBAI 2487/Mum/12 2007-08 [PAN: AAACT4060A] Revenue by : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, CIT-DR Assessee by : Ms. Aarti Vissanji, AR Date of Hearing : 31-01-2020 Date of Pronouncement : 03-02-2…

TATA SONS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.C.I.T. 2(3), MUMBAI

Appeal is partly allowed and the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 4543/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Feb 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti Vissanji, ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, CIT-DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. A.Y. Appellant Respondent 4893/Mum/12 2006-07 M/s. Tata Sons Ltd., ACIT-2(3) Bombay House, MUMBAI 24, Homi Mody Street, Fort, 2545/Mum/12 2007-08 MUMBAI [PAN: AAACT4060A] M/s. Tata Sons Ltd., 4543/Mum/12 2006-07 Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody ACIT-2(3) Street, MUMBAI Fort, MUMBAI 2487/Mum/12 2007-08 [PAN: AAACT4060A] Revenue by : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy, CIT-DR Assessee by : Ms. Aarti Vissanji, AR Date of Hearing : 31-01-2020 Date of Pronouncement : 03-02-2…

ADDL CIT 1(3), MUMBAI vs. TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD ( FORMERLY VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 4452/MUM/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am Additional Commissioner Vs. M/S. Tata Communications Of Income Tax, Range – Limited (Formerly Known As 1(3) Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited) Mumbai Videsh Sanchar Bhavan Room No.540/564, 5 Th M.G.Road, Fort Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 001 Maharshi Karve Road, New Marine Linmes Mumbai – 400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacv2808C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) & M/S. Tata Communications Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Limited (Formerly Known As Income Tax, Range – 1(3) Videsh Sanchar Nigam Mumbai Limited) Room No.540, Aayakar Videsh Sanchar Bhavan Bhavan, Maharshi Karve M.G.Road, Fort Road Mumbai – 400 001 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacv2808C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) M/S. Tata Communications Ltd.

Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)Section 263

…sing Officer and it is not in respect of Addl. CIT or Addl. DIT. Thus, none of these notifications can validly authorize or empower the Addl. CIT, Range-1(3) to act as an Assessing Officer in the present case. In case of Mega Corporation Ltd. vs. ACIT, [2015] 155 ITD 1019, the Tribunal while deciding identical issue of exercise of powers and functions of Assessing Officer by Addl. CIT dealt with the aforesaid notifications relied upon by the learned Departmental Representative and following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Valvoline Cummins v/s DCIT, [2008] 307 FUR 103 (Del) held that without a not…

SABRAS INVESTMENT & TRADING CO. LTD ( NOW MERGED WITH TATA CHEMICALS LTD),MUMBAI vs. ACIT 2(2), MUMBAI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 872/MUM/2013[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2019AY 1999-00

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 915/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 916/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 917/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 918/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 869/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 870/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 871/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 872/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य एवुं श्री राजेश क मार लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 915/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 916/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 917/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 918/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 869/Mum/2013 (inaQa-arNa ba…

SABRAS INVESTMENT & TRADING CO. LTD ( NOW MERGED WITH TATA CHEMICALS LTD),MUMBAI vs. JCIT SP RG, 1, MUMBAI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 871/MUM/2013[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2019AY 1998-99

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 915/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 916/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 917/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 918/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 869/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 870/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 871/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 872/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य एवुं श्री राजेश क मार लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 915/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 916/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 917/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 918/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 869/Mum/2013 (inaQa-arNa ba…

SABRAS INVESTMENT & TRADING CO. LTD ( NOW MERGED WITH TATA CHEMICALS LTD),MUMBAI vs. JCIT SP RG, 1, MUMBAI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 870/MUM/2013[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2019AY 1997-98

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 915/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 916/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 917/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 918/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 869/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 870/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 871/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 872/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य एवुं श्री राजेश क मार लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 915/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 916/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 917/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 918/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 869/Mum/2013 (inaQa-arNa ba…

SABRAS INVESTMENT & TRADING P.LTD ( NOW MERGED WITH TATA CHEMICALS LTD),MUMBAI vs. JCIT SP RG, 1, MUMBAI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 869/MUM/2013[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2019AY 1996-97

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 915/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 916/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 917/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 918/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 869/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 870/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 871/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 872/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य एवुं श्री राजेश क मार लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 915/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 916/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 917/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 918/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 869/Mum/2013 (inaQa-arNa ba…

SABRAS INVESTMENT & TRADING CO. LTD ( NOW MERGED WITH TATA CHEMICAL LTD),MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 2(2), MUMBAI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 918/MUM/2012[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2019AY 1999-00

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 915/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 916/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 917/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 918/Mum/2012 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 869/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 870/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 871/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 872/Mum/2013 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 1999-00)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi &For Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, DR
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य एवुं श्री राजेश क मार लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 915/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1996-97) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 916/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1997-98) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 917/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1998-99) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 918/Mum/2012 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 1999-00) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 869/Mum/2013 (inaQa-arNa ba…

ADDL CIT 2(3), MUMBAI vs. TATA SONS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and appeal

ITA 5572/MUM/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Shri G. Manjunatha, Am Tata Sons Limited Vs. Addl.Cit-2(3) Bombay House Room No.556 Homi Mody Street Aaykar Bhawan Mumbai-400 001 M.K.Road Mumbai-400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaact4060A Appellant) .. Respondent) & Addl.Cit-2(3) Vs. Tata Sons Limited Room No.552, 5Th Floor Bombay House Aaykar Bhawan Homi Mody Street M.K.Road Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaact4060A Appellant) .. Respondent) Assessee By Aarti Vissanji Revenue By R.Manjunatha Swamy

Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…de to the authority and legal competence itself of the Additional Commissioner of Income tax to pass the impugned assessment order upon the assessee. Similar view has been taken by the Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of Mega Corporation Ltd Vs. Additional CIT 155 ITD 1019 (Delhi) following the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Valvolines Cummins Ltd, supra. 3.16 In view of the facts and circumstances, of this case and the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Bombay High Court relied upon by the Ld. Counsel in its petition as mentioned above, we find that these additional grounds deserv…

TATA SONS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and appeal

ITA 5090/MUM/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Shri G. Manjunatha, Am Tata Sons Limited Vs. Addl.Cit-2(3) Bombay House Room No.556 Homi Mody Street Aaykar Bhawan Mumbai-400 001 M.K.Road Mumbai-400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaact4060A Appellant) .. Respondent) & Addl.Cit-2(3) Vs. Tata Sons Limited Room No.552, 5Th Floor Bombay House Aaykar Bhawan Homi Mody Street M.K.Road Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 Pan/Gir No.Aaact4060A Appellant) .. Respondent) Assessee By Aarti Vissanji Revenue By R.Manjunatha Swamy

Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…de to the authority and legal competence itself of the Additional Commissioner of Income tax to pass the impugned assessment order upon the assessee. Similar view has been taken by the Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of Mega Corporation Ltd Vs. Additional CIT 155 ITD 1019 (Delhi) following the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Valvolines Cummins Ltd, supra. 3.16 In view of the facts and circumstances, of this case and the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Bombay High Court relied upon by the Ld. Counsel in its petition as mentioned above, we find that these additional grounds deserv…

M/S. TATA SONS LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ACIT CIR2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3745/MUM/2006[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Nov 2017AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri P K Bansal & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Dinesh VyasFor Respondent: Shri P C Chhotaray
Section 120(4)(b)Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263

…de to the authority and legal competence itself of the Additional Commissioner of Income tax to pass the impugned assessment order upon the assessee. Similar view has been taken by the Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of Mega Corporation Ltd Vs. Additional CIT 155 ITD 1019 (Delhi) following the judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Valvolines Cummins Ltd, supra. 21 Tata Sons Limited 3.16 In view of the facts and circumstances, of this case and the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Bombay High Court relied upon by the Ld. Counsel in its petition as mentioned above, we find that these ad…

Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2