Md. Serajuddin & Brothers v. CIT

210 Taxmann 84High Court2012#7128 most cited
16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also reported as

80 DTR 46

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Md. Serajuddin & Brothers v. CIT

ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1), PANAJI vs. M/S JAY RAM ORE CARRIERS, VASCO

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands allowed

ITA 227/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.227/Pan/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Acit, Circle-2(1), Panaji, Vs. M/S. Jay Ram Ore Goa. Carriers, 2Nd Floor, Sunflower Appts, Opp. St. Andrew Church, Vasco, Goa. Pan : Aaffj0752R Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri N. Shrikanth Assessee By : Shri R. D. Onkar Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.08.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Panaji [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 30.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Respondent-Assessee Is A Partnership Firm Engaged In The Business Of Operation Of Barge Of Contract. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Was Filed By The Appellant Firm On 29.07.2014 Declaring Total Income

For Appellant: Shri R. D. OnkarFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 143(3)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI – VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.227/PAN/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 ACIT, Circle-2(1), Panaji, Vs. M/s. Jay Ram Ore Goa. Carriers, 2nd Floor, Sunflower Appts, Opp. St. Andrew Church, Vasco, Goa. PAN : AAFFJ0752R Appellant Respondent Revenue by : Shri N. Shrikanth Assessee by : Shri R. D. Onkar Date of hearing : 16.08.2023 Date of pronouncement : 29.08.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue dir…

VIMAL AND SONS,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(1),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2169/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 40

…पुणे "यायपीठ "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “SMC” पुणे "यायपीठ पुणे म"म"म"म" आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण पुणे अिधकरण पुणे पुणे पुणे पुणे IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, PUNE "ी "ी डी "ी "ी डी. क"णाकरा क"णाकरा क"णाकरा राव क"णाकरा लेखा सद"य सद"य सद"य केकेकेके सम" सद"य सम" सम" सम" डी डी राव राव, लेखा राव लेखा लेखा BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / ITA No.2169/PUN/2017 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 वष" Vimal and Sons, 6, Abhyuday Apartments, Bhandarkar Road, Pune – 411 004 अपीलाथ"…

Md. Serajuddin & Brothers v. CIT (210 Taxmann 84) — Cited in 16 Judgments | BharatTax