Marg Ltd. v. CIT

120 Taxmann.com 84High Court2020#1306 most cited

What is Marg Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The disallowance of expenditure incurred to earn exempt income under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the actual exempt income earned by the assessee in that assessment year.

87

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Marg Ltd. v. CIT · Marg Ltd. · Section 14A disallowance · Rule 8D computation · disallowance cannot exceed exempt income · expenditure for exempt income · Madras High Court · AO satisfaction Section 14A · 120 Taxmann.com 84 · exempt income restriction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Marg Ltd. v. CIT

Shriram Capital Private Limited(Formerly Known As Shriram Financial Ventures(Chennai) Private Limited), Chennai vs. DCIT, Corporate Cirlcle-3(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed partly

ITA 813/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 813/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shriram Capital Private Limited Deputy Commissioner Of (Formerly Known As Shriram V. Income Tax, Financial Ventures (Chennai) Corporate Circle 3(1), Private Limited) Chennai. Shriram House No. 4, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. [Pan: Aapcs-5667-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. R. Sivaraman, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.10.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.10.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 14ASection 14A(2)Section 80M

…out the amount disallowed by the appellant u/s.14A of Rs.17,750/- , as required u/s.14A(2). In this connection the appellant relies on the following decisions: (i) CIT Vs Taikisha Engineering India Ltd ( 229 Taxman 143) Delhi HC (ii) Marg Ltd Vs CIT, Chennai (120 Taxmann.com 84)( Madras HC) (iii) In the appellant's own case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "D" Bench, Chennai, in their orders in I.TA No. 942 I Chny / 2020 dated 29.07.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18 & in I.TA No. 1768 / Chny / 2019 dated 16.12.2019 for the assessment year 2016- 17 has deleted the addition made u/s.14A r.w rule 8D as the Ass…

D.C.I.T., CC-3(4), Kolkata vs. M/S. Forum Project Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, all the three captioned appeals of the revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 585/KOL/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Rajesh Kumari.T.(Ss)A Nos.108,109&585/Kol/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 Dcit, Cc-3(2), Kolkata..................................................................……Appellant Vs. M/S Forum Projects Pvt. Ltd...........................……........……...…..…..Respondent 4/1, Red Cross Place, Dalhousie, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aadcs7575E] Appearances By: Shri Subhrajyoti Bhattacharjee, Cit(Dr), Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 30, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 05, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Dated 20.05.2022, 08.06.2022 & 25.11.2014 Respectively Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Contesting Therein The Confirmation Of Additions Made By The Assessing Officer (In Short ‘The A.O) In The Assessments Carried Out U/S 153A Of The Act. Since The Facts & Issues Involved In All These Appeals Are Identical, Hence These Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. First We Take Revenue’S Appeal In Ita No.108/Kol/2022 For Assessment Year 2010-11. I.T.(Ss)A Nos.108,109&585/Kol/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S Forum Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Section 14ASection 153ASection 2(22)(e)Section 24Section 250

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘सी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.(SS)A Nos.108,109&585/Kol/2022 Assessment years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 DCIT, CC-3(2), Kolkata..................................................................……Appellant vs. M/s Forum Projects Pvt. Ltd...........................……........……...…..…..Respondent 4/1, Red Cross Place, Dalhousie, Kolkata-1. [PAN: AADCS7575E] Appearances by: Shri Subhrajyoti Bhattacharjee, CIT(DR), appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Soumitra…