Mahender Pal Narang v. CBDT

Phool Singh, Hisar vs. ITO Ward-1, Hisar

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaita No.1517/Del/2023 (Assessment Year 2015-16)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1517/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16) ITA No.1519/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18) Phool Singh, ITO, Ward-1, H. No.273, Sunder Nagar, Hissar. Near New Grain Market, Vs. Hissar, Haryana-125001. PAN-AYOPS2136H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 02/09/2025 Date of Pronouncement 02/09/2025 Phool Singh vs. ITO O R D E R PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, AM: These five appeals are preferred b…

Phool Singh, Hisar vs. ITO Ward-1, Hisar

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaita No.1517/Del/2023 (Assessment Year 2015-16)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1517/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16) ITA No.1519/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18) Phool Singh, ITO, Ward-1, H. No.273, Sunder Nagar, Hissar. Near New Grain Market, Vs. Hissar, Haryana-125001. PAN-AYOPS2136H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 02/09/2025 Date of Pronouncement 02/09/2025 Phool Singh vs. ITO O R D E R PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, AM: These five appeals are preferred b…

Phool Singh, Hisar vs. ITO Ward-1, Hisar

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaita No.1517/Del/2023 (Assessment Year 2015-16)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1517/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16) ITA No.1519/Del/2023 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18) Phool Singh, ITO, Ward-1, H. No.273, Sunder Nagar, Hissar. Near New Grain Market, Vs. Hissar, Haryana-125001. PAN-AYOPS2136H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 02/09/2025 Date of Pronouncement 02/09/2025 Phool Singh vs. ITO O R D E R PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, AM: These five appeals are preferred b…

Naseem Ahmed, Greater Noida vs. ITO Ward 2(3), Noida

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmanaseem Ahmed, Income Tax Officer, Vill: Haldouni, Post Kuleshra, Ward-2(3), Greater Noida,Gautambudh Vs. Noida Nagar, U.P.201306. Pan-Aijpa1555F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Raghu Raj Singh, Adv. & Shri Vijay Singhla, Ca. Department By Shridheeraj Kumar Jain,Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 15/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15/07/2025 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: This Appeal Is Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 25.12.2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Arising Out Of Order Dated 09.12.2019 Made By Assessing Officer(Hereinafter Referred As ‘The Ao’) U/S 144 R.W.S 147Of The Act For Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Filed His Return Of Income Of Rs.2,35,000/- & Had Also Claimed Credit For Tds Of Rs.9,13,823/- The Case Of The Assessee Was Reopened By Issuing Of Notice 148 Of The Act On The Basis Of Information In Possession Of The Department That The Assessee Had Received Interest On Enhanced Compensation Of Rs.8,84,023/- From New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (Noida) During The Financial Year 2015-16, Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-17 On Which Tds Of Rs.8,84,023/- Was Deducted By The Authority. The Assessee Had Filed Return But Assessing Officer Was Of The View That The Amount Of Rs.88,40,230/- Was In The Nature Of Interest

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH‘E’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Naseem Ahmed, Income Tax Officer, Vill: Haldouni, Post Kuleshra, Ward-2(3), Greater Noida,GautamBudh Vs. Noida Nagar, U.P.201306. PAN-AIJPA1555F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Raghu Raj Singh, Adv. and Shri Vijay Singhla, CA. Department by ShriDheeraj Kumar Jain,Sr.DR Date of Hearing 15/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 15/07/2025 ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 25.12.2023 passed u/s 250 of the…

Sanjay, Ghaziabad vs. Ward 2(1), Ghaziabad

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godaraita No. 4481/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Sanjay, Vs Income Tax Officer, Village & P.O.-Raispur, Ward-2(1), Ghaziabad, Hapur Road, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201002 Uttar Pradesh-201002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Cvips0942Q Assessee By: Sh. Sumit Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.08.2025 Order

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member ITA No. 4481/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Sanjay, Vs Income Tax Officer, Village & P.O.-Raispur, Ward-2(1), Ghaziabad, Hapur Road, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201002 Uttar Pradesh-201002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. CVIPS0942Q Assessee by: Sh. Sumit Bansal, CA Revenue by : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 27.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 27.08.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-…

Lal Chand, Gurgaon vs. ITO Ward - 1(4), Gurgaon

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godaraita No. 4479/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Lal Chand, Vs Income Tax Officer, C/O Ca R.S. Poonia, Ward-1(4), D-83-B, Siwad Area, Krishna Marg, Gurugram, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015 Haryana-122016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agkpl7795F Assessee By: Sh. Rajat Chaudhary, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.08.2025 Order

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member ITA No. 4479/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2018-19 Lal Chand, Vs Income Tax Officer, C/o CA R.S. Poonia, Ward-1(4), D-83-B, Siwad Area, Krishna Marg, Gurugram, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015 Haryana-122016 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AGKPL7795F Assessee by: Sh. Rajat Chaudhary, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 27.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 27.08.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFA…

Balvinder Singh, Karnal, Haryana vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-1, Karnal, Haryana

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Vs. Income Tax Officer, Sh. Balvinder Singh, 455, Village-Gobindgarh, Ward-1, Karnal Post Officer- Dacher, Karnal, Haryana PAN: FAFPS2585Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Rajat Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Payal Jhorar, Adv. Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 20.08.2025 Date of pronouncement 20.08.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short…

Leelu Ram, Gurugram vs. Income Tax Officer, Gurugam

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraassessment Year: 2018-19 Vs. Income Tax Officer, Sh. Leelu Ram, S/O-Mangal Singh, C/O-Ysr Gurugram & Associates, Plot No. 214, Basement, Sector-47, Haryana Pan: Apspr3189Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. M.R. Sahu, Ca Department By Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. Dr

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Vs. Income Tax Officer, Sh. Leelu Ram, S/o-Mangal Singh, C/o-YSR Gurugram & Associates, Plot No. 214, Basement, Sector-47, Haryana PAN: APSPR3189Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. M.R. Sahu, CA Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 20.08.2025 Date of pronouncement 20.08.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”],…

Komal Adlakha, Gurugram vs. ITO, Ward 2(2), Gurugram

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraassessment Year: 2019-20 Vs. Ito, Komal Adlakha, A06, Parsvnath Green Ville, Ward-2(2), Sohna Road, Gurgaon Gurgaon Pan: Autpa5180C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Mahfuzur Rahman, Ca Department By Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. Dr

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2019-20 Vs. ITO, Komal Adlakha, A06, Parsvnath Green Ville, Ward-2(2), Sohna Road, Gurgaon Gurgaon PAN: AUTPA5180C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Mahfuzur Rahman, CA Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 18.08.2025 Date of pronouncement 18.08.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFA…

Ravinder, Gurgaon vs. National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2018-19

…1 Ravinder v. NFAC A.Y. 2018-19 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Ravinder, Vs National e-Assessment H. No. 346/1, Bhim Garg Kheri, Centre, Delhi. Near Railway Station, Gurgaon-122001. PAN: AHVPR 9454 P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Shri Jai Bhagwan Saini, Adv. Department represented by Shri Rajesh Kumar dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of hearing 04.08.2025 Date of pronouncement 04.08.2025 O R D E R PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M: This assessee’s appeal for as…

Jai Bhagwan, Vpo Badshahpur, Gurgaon, Hr vs. Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon, Haryana

The appeal stands allowed and the concurrent findings of the AO and CIT(A) are hereby affirmed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishrajai Bhagwan Vs. Income Tax Officer Vpo Badshahpur Income Tax Building Gurgaon Gurugram- 122001 Haryana-122001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Amapb8989P Appellant .. Respondent

…on would fall under section 28 of the 1894 Act and such payment could not par-take the character of compensation for acquisition of agricultural land and thus not exempt from tax. 5. The Hon'ble P&H, High Court in the case Mahindra Pal Narang vs. CBDT (2020) 423 ITR 13 dated 19/2/2020 wherein the Hon'ble High Court again considered the provisions of Section 10 (37), 56 (2) (viii, 57 (iv), 145B of the income tax act. It rejected the reliance by the assessee on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ghanshyam HUF. It further rejected the reliance by the assessee on the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court…

Radhey Shyam Saini, Hisar vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2014-15 Vs. Pcit, Sh. Radhey Shyam Saini, H. No. 1174/334, Rohtak Ramlila Chowk, Hisar, Haryana Pan: Bxhps4356Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Kuldeep Khera, Ca Sh. Mohit Girdhar, Ca Department By Sh. Mahesh Kumar, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23.07.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2014-15, Arises Against The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax [In Short, The “Pcit”], Rohtak’S Order No. Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2023- 24/1062878555(1), Dated 18.03.2024 Involving Proceedings Under Section 147 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’). Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. It Emerges During The Course Of Hearing That The Sole Substantive Issue Between The Parties Is That Of Correctness Of The Learned Lower Authorities Action Assessing The Assessee’S Interest Component Of Land Acquisition Compensation U/S 28 Of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, While Invoking Section 57(Iv) R.W.S. 56(1)(A) R.W.S. 145A(B) Of The Act. 3. Learned Sr. Dr Representing The Department Vehemently Argued That The Instant Issue Is No More Res Integra In Light Of Mahender Pal Narang Vs. Cbdt (2020) 423 Itr 13 (P&H) As Well As Pcit Vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi Huf (2024) 161 Taxmann.Com 301 (Del.) Wherein The Department Has Succeeded Before Their Lordships That The Impugned Interest Component Ought To Be Assessed As Income From “Other” Sources Only. 4. We Have Given Our Thoughtful Consideration To The Assessee’S Pleadings & Revenue’S Foregoing Vehement Contention. It Emerges That This Tribunal’S Recent Decision In Pawan Kumar Vs. Pcit (2024) 159 Taxmann.Com 61 (Del.-Trib.) Has Distinguished The Said Case Law As Under:

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 Vs. PCIT, Sh. Radhey Shyam Saini, H. No. 1174/334, Rohtak Ramlila Chowk, Hisar, Haryana PAN: BXHPS4356Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Kuldeep Khera, CA Sh. Mohit Girdhar, CA Department by Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 15.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 23.07.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax [in sho…

Shammi Nagpal HUF, Hisar vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14 Vs. Pcit, Shammi Nagpal Huf, H. No. 7, Sector-13, Hissar, Rohtak Haryana Pan: Aazhs3505D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Kuldeep Khera, Ca Sh. Mohit Girdhar, Ca Department By Sh. Mahesh Kumar, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23.07.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2013-14, Arises Against The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (In Short “The Pcit”), Rohtak’S Din & Order No. Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2023- 24/1062887031(1), Dated 19.03.2024 Involving Proceedings Under Section 147 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’). Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. It Emerges During The Course Of Hearing That The Sole Substantive Issue Between The Parties Is That Of Correctness Of The Learned Lower Authorities Action Assessing The Assessee’S Interest Component Of Land Acquisition Compensation U/S 28 Of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, While Invoking Section 57(Iv) R.W.S. 56(1)(A) R.W.S. 145A(B) Of The Act. 3. Learned Sr. Dr Representing The Department Vehemently Argued That The Instant Issue Is No More Res Integra In Light Of Mahender Pal Narang Vs. Cbdt (2020) 423 Itr 13 (P&H) As Well As Pcit Vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi Huf (2024) 161 Taxmann.Com 301 (Del.) Wherein The Department Has Succeeded Before Their Lordships That The Impugned Interest Component Ought To Be Assessed As Income From “Other” Sources Only. 4. We Have Given Our Thoughtful Consideration To The Assessee’S Pleadings & Revenue’S Foregoing Vehement Contention. It Emerges That This Tribunal’S Recent Decision In Pawan Kumar Vs. Pcit (2024) 159 Taxmann.Com 61 (Del.-Trib.) Has Distinguished The Said Case Law As Under:

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2013-14 Vs. PCIT, Shammi Nagpal HUF, H. No. 7, Sector-13, Hissar, Rohtak Haryana PAN: AAZHS3505D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. Kuldeep Khera, CA Sh. Mohit Girdhar, CA Department by Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 15.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 23.07.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (in short “the PCIT”),…

ITO, Ward-1(1), Faridabad vs. Chaman, Faridabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2017-18 Vs. Chaman, Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), H. No. 437, Sector-9, Faridabad Faridabad Pan: Bfapd6698P (Appellant) (Respondent) With C.O. No.103/Del/2024 [Arising Out Of Ita No.2774/Del/2024] Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vs. Income Tax Officer, Chaman, H. No. 437, Sector-9, Ward-1(1), Faridabad, Haryana Faridabad Pan: Bfapd6698P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Gaurav, Adv. Department By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 25.06.2025 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm This Revenue’S Appeal Ita No. 2774/Del/2024 & Assessee’S Cross Objection C.O. No. 103/Del/2024 For Assessment Year 2017- 18, Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [In Short, The

…d have taken into consideration, the binding decision of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court i.e. Hon'ble 11 | P a g e ITA No.2774/Del/2024 & C.O. No. 103/Del/2024 Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 19.02.2020 in the case of Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT (2020) 423 ITR 13 (P&H) wherein the Hon'ble High Court has dealt with the controversy arising from the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF dated 16th July, 2009 relating to the taxability of interest received on compensation or enhanced compensation and also the amendments/provisions of section 56(2)(viii) introduced through Finan…

Hari Singh, Palwal vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Faridabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

…### IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: 'B' NEW DELHI ## BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.4082/Del/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 | Sh. Hari Singh, | | Vs. Income Tax Officer, | | | |---------------------------|--|-------------------------|--|--| | Dharam Nagar, | | Ward-1(3), | | | | Opp. H.B. Colony, Palwal, | | Faridabad | | | | Haryana | | | | | | PAN: CDVPS5228Q | | | | | | (Appellant)…

Income Tax Officer, Panipat vs. Dinesh Kaushik, Panipat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2018-19 Vs. Sh. Dinesh Kaushik, Income Tax Officer, Panipat Vpo Baljattan, Panipat, Haryana Pan: Awjpk9483E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Vs. Sh. Dinesh Kaushik, Income Tax Officer, Panipat VPO Baljattan, Panipat, Haryana PAN: AWJPK9483E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of hearing 05.06.2025 Date of pronouncement 05.06.2025 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short,…

Jile Singh, Faridabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Faridabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godaraita No. 2223/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Jile Singh, Vs Income Tax Officer, H. No. 68, Sotai, Near Mahipal Ward-51(3), Nambardar, Ballabgarh, Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana-121002 Haryana-121004 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fzsps8684G Assessee By: None Revenue By : Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 02.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 02.06.2025 Order

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member ITA No. 2223/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Jile Singh, Vs Income Tax Officer, H. No. 68, Sotai, Near Mahipal Ward-51(3), Nambardar, Ballabgarh, Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana-121002 Haryana-121004 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. FZSPS8684G Assessee by: None Revenue by : Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 02.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 02.06.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2…

Sanakari, Village Bhooda Noida vs. Ward 3(4) Sector 24 Noida, Noida

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godaraita No. 1533/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Sanakari, Vs Income Tax Officer, H. No. 18, Village Bhooda, Noida, Ward-3(4), District Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201301 Uttar Pradesh-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Etcps4927M Assessee By : Sh. Pawan Sharma, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 29.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.05.2025 Order

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member ITA No. 1533/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Sanakari, Vs Income Tax Officer, H. No. 18, Village Bhooda, Noida, Ward-3(4), District Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201301 Uttar Pradesh-201301 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. ETCPS4927M Assessee by : Sh. Pawan Sharma, CA Revenue by : Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 29.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 29.05.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2015-16, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NF…