Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT

86 ITR 417Supreme Court of India1972#3293 most cited

What is Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The intention of the parties is a crucial element in determining the situs where property passes to the buyer, which in turn is relevant for taxation.

36

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2010 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT · 86 ITR 417 · SC · situs of transfer of property · intention of parties · passing of property · international transaction · income sourcing

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234ASection 234BSection 270ASection 144Section 153Section 234C
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 44bbbsection 9(l)(vii)section 9(2)commercial substancesection 9(l)section 44bbsection 59section 44bsection 9(1)(i)fees for included servicestransfer of capital assetassistant director

Judgments citing Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT

Audi Ag, Mumbai vs. DDIT (It) RG 1(1)(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 743/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2019AY 2011-12
Section 143(3)(iii)Section 9

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

Audi Ag, Mumbai vs. Addl DIT RG 1(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7335/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhaudi Ag Adit Range-1(1), C/O S R B C & Associates, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, 14Th Floor, The Ruby, 29 Mumbai-400020. Senapati Bapat Marg, Vs. Dadar (West), Mumbai-400028. Pan: Aahca3173A Appellant Respondent Audi Ag Adit Range-1(1), C/O S R B C & Associates, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, 14Th Floor, The Ruby, 29 Mumbai-400020. Senapati Bapat Marg, Vs. Dadar (West), Mumbai-400028. Pan: Aahca3173A Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Rajan Vora/Nimesh Vora/ Sajan Choksi (Ar) Respondent By : Shri V. Sreekar (Cit-Dr) With Nishant Samaiya (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.09.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh; 1. These Two Appeal By Assessee Are Directed Against The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144(C)(13) In Pursuance Of Direction Of Dispute Resolution Panel-I Under Section 144(C)(5) Dated

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vora/Nimesh Vora/For Respondent: Shri V. Sreekar (CIT-DR) with Nishant Samaiya (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(13)Section 254(1)Section 9Section 90(2)

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

M/S Nokia Corporation, New Delhi vs. ADIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 5819/DEL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

ADIT, New Delhi vs. Nokia Corportion, Gurgaon

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1237/DEL/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

ADIT, New Delhi vs. Nokia Corportion, Gurgaon

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1236/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

M/S. Nokia Corporation (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy), New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1007/DEL/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

ADIT, New Delhi vs. Nokia Corportion, Gurgaon

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1238/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

M/S. Nokia Corporation (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy), New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1008/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

M/S. Nokia Corporation (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy), New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee on the grounds- a

ITA 1006/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1006/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1007/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1008/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Ita No. 5819/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Nokia Corporation Vs Asstt. Director Of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), International Taxation, (Formerly Nokia Networks Oy) New Delhi C/O Tarandeep Singh, F-99, Lajpat Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcn3748E Ita No. 1236/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1237/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 1238/Del/2010 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. G. K. Dhall, CIT DR

…took place outside India with the passing of the property from seller to buyer and acceptance test is not the determinative of this factor and further referring to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 417 (SC), held that overall agreement does not result the income accruing in India and the execution of an overall agreement is promoted by purely commercial considerations as India Cellular Operator would be desirous of having a single entity that could liaise with. Thus, it was concluded that the place of negotiation, the place of signing of agreeme…

DCIT (It) 2(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Daimler Ag, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 183/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri G. Manjunatha, Am Dcit(It)-2(1)(2), Vs. M/S. Daimler Ag Room No.1612, 16Th Floor, C/O. Srbc & Associates Llp, Chartered Accountants, 14 Th Air India Building, Nariman Point Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Mumbai – 400021 Bapat Marg, Dadar(W), Mumbai - 400028 Pan/Gir No. Aabcd2354C Appellant) .. Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 5

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, AM DCIT(IT)-2(1)(2), Vs. M/s. Daimler AG Room No.1612, 16th Floor, C/o. SRBC & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants, 14 th Air India Building, Nariman Point Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Mumbai – 400021 Bapat Marg, Dadar(W), Mumbai - 400028 PAN/GIR No. AABCD2354C Appellant) .. Respondent) Revenue by Shri Pankaj Kumar Assessee by Shri M.P. Lohia & Shri Hemen Chandariya Date of Hearing 28/03/2019 Date of Pronouncement 28 /03 /2019 आदेश / O R D E R PER G. MANJUNATHA (A.M): This appeal filed by the revenu…

Ulo Systems Llc, Gurgaon vs. ADIT, Dehradun

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 285/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jun 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Sh. Nageswar Rao (Adv.) &For Respondent: Sh. Satpal Gulati (CIT DR)
Section 115ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 44BSection 44D

…ot been included in the receipts mentioned above. The same have not been offered to tax in India as the sake has been concluded outside India. In this regard, reliance has been placed on, inter-alia, the following rulings. -Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v CIT (86 ITR 417)(SC); -CIT v Mewar Textile Mills Ltd. (91 ITR 542) (SC); -CIT vs. Fried Krupp Industries (128 ITR 27) (Mad); -CIT v Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. (135 ITR 762)(Bom); and -ACIT v. Skoda Exports (172 ITR 358)(AP)” As per the TDS certificates enclosed with the return of income it has been observed that the assessee has earned the revenues and tax has b…

Ulo Systems Llc., Gurgaon vs. ADIT, Dehradun

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5278/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jun 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Sh. Nageswar Rao (Adv.) &For Respondent: Sh. Satpal Gulati (CIT DR)
Section 115ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 44BSection 44D

…ot been included in the receipts mentioned above. The same have not been offered to tax in India as the sake has been concluded outside India. In this regard, reliance has been placed on, inter-alia, the following rulings. -Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. v CIT (86 ITR 417)(SC); -CIT v Mewar Textile Mills Ltd. (91 ITR 542) (SC); -CIT vs. Fried Krupp Industries (128 ITR 27) (Mad); -CIT v Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. (135 ITR 762)(Bom); and -ACIT v. Skoda Exports (172 ITR 358)(AP)” As per the TDS certificates enclosed with the return of income it has been observed that the assessee has earned the revenues and tax has b…

DCIT (It) 2(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Daimler Ag (Formerly Known As Daimler Chrysler Ag), Mumbai

ITA 5704/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm Dcit (It)-2(1)(2), M/S Daimler Ag Room No. 1713, 17Th Floor, C/O Srbc & Associates Llp बिधम/ Air India Building, 14Th Floor, The Ruby, Nariman Point, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Vs. Mumbai-400021 Dadar (W), Mumbai-400050 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan No. Aabcd2354C (अऩीराथी /Revenue) (प्रत्मथी / Assessee) :

For Appellant: Shri M.P. Lohia &For Respondent: Shri V. Vidhyadhar, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 5(2)Section 9(1)(i)

…P a g e | 1 ITA No.5704/Mum/2016 AY. 2011-12 DCIT(IT)2(1)(2) Vs. M/s Daimler AG IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM DCIT (IT)-2(1)(2), M/s Daimler AG Room No. 1713, 17th Floor, C/o SRBC & Associates LLP बिधम/ Air India Building, 14th Floor, The Ruby, Nariman Point, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Vs. Mumbai-400021 Dadar (W), Mumbai-400050 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN No. AABCD2354C (अऩीराथी /Revenue) (प्रत्मथी / Assessee) : अऩीराथी की ओय से / Revenue by : Shri V. Vidhyadhar, Sr. D.R प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Assessee by : Shri M.P. Lohia & Shri Heman…

ADIT (It) (2), Mumbai vs. Daimler Ag, Mumbai

ITA 7648/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 7648 & 7649/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09 & 2009-10) Asst. Dit(It) -1(2), M/S. Daimler Ag Room No.119, 1St Floor, Scindia C/O Srbc & Associates 14Th Floor, The Ruby 29, बनाम/ House, N.M. Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 038. Senapati Bapat Marg Vs. Dadar (West) Mumbai-400 028. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aabcd 2354C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Hemen Chandariya
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 234B

…nsel for the assessee reiterated the arguments before the ld. CIT(A). he further relied on the following case laws: CIT v Gulf Oil (Great Britain) Ltd 108 ITR 874 (Bom) (Refer pg 56,62 of Paper Book-I) Mahabir Commercial Co Ltd vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (86 ITR 417) (SC); (Refer Pg 64, 80 of Paper Book) Commissioner of Income-tax vs Mewar Textile Mills Ltd (91 ITR 542) (SC); (Refer pg 81,83 of Paper Book I) Additional Commissioner of income-tax v Skoda Export, Praha (172 ITR 358) (AP) (Refer pg 84,88 of Paper Book I) (A.Y 2008-09 &2009-10) M/s. Daimler AG 10. The ld. Counsel further submitted as follows: Th…

Director of Income Tax, New Delhi vs. Lg Cable Ltd

The appeal stands disposed of

ITA-703/2009HC Delhi24 Dec 2010
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 244ASection 260Section 44B

…on the circular of CBDT Circular No.23 dated 23.07.2009. Reliance was also placed on the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in Income tax 2010:DHC:6281-DB 724 (SC) and Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax West Bengal, (1972) 86 ITR 417 (SC) to submit that income from the offshore supply of equipment was not covered under Section 5(2) of the Act. 10. At the outset Mr. Sajeev Sabharwal, the learned counsel for the Revenue contended that a plain reading of the two contracts would show that they were integrated contracts. Relying heavily upon Article 6 of both the contracts,…

Director of Income Tax Delhi vs. Lg.Cable Ltd

The appeal stands disposed of

ITA - 703 / 2009HC Delhi24 Dec 2010
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 244ASection 260Section 44B

…on the circular of CBDT Circular No.23 dated 23.07.2009. Reliance was also placed on the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in Income tax 2010:DHC:6281-DB 724 (SC) and Mahabir Commercial Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax West Bengal, (1972) 86 ITR 417 (SC) to submit that income from the offshore supply of equipment was not covered under Section 5(2) of the Act. 10. At the outset Mr. Sajeev Sabharwal, the learned counsel for the Revenue contended that a plain reading of the two contracts would show that they were integrated contracts. Relying heavily upon Article 6 of both the contracts,…