Brijendra Nath Agarwal, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax
In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed as indicated above
ITA 1666/PUN/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Nov 2018AY 2007-08
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1666/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Shri Brijendra Nath Agarwal, Mzsk & Associates, Chartered Accountants Level 3, Business Bay, Plot No.84, Wellesley Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Near Rto, Pune – 411001 …. Pan: Aawpa9005D Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Central Circle 2(1), Pune
For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153A
…aforesaid two witnesses were only the basis of issuing show cause notice, hence the impugned order passed by the Tribunal was set aside and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. 21. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sahara India (Firm) Vs. CIT and Another (2008) 300 ITR 403 (SC) while deciding issue of principles of natural justice and Rule of audi alteram partem held as under:- “11. Rules of "natural justice" are not embodied rules. The phrase "natural justice" is also not capable of a precise definition. The underlying principle of natural justice, evolved under the common law, is to check arbitrary exercise of po…