M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd. v. ACIT

51 SOT 207Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#1278 most cited

What is M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Deduction under section 80-IA is available to developers who undertake entrepreneurial investment risk, not merely to contractors who undertake business risk. The nature of the work undertaken determines eligibility.

89

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd. v. ACIT · 51 SOT 207 · section 80IA(4) · deduction under section 80IA · infrastructure facility · developer vs contractor · entrepreneurial investment risk · business risk

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd. v. ACIT

Welspun Projects Ltd.(Formerly Known As Msk Projects (India) Ltd.), Baroda vs. The Dy.CIT, Range-4, Baroda

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 225/AHD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Oct 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1864/Ahd/2013 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2005-06 & "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006-2007 Welspun Projects (Formerly Known Ito, Ward-4(1) As Msk Projects (India) Ltd. Vs Baroda. 707-708, Sterling Centre R.C.Dutt Road, Alkapuri Baroda 390 005. Pan : Aabcm 4107 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vartik Chokshi With Shri Biren Shah, Ar Revenue By : Smt.Aparna M. Agrawal, Dr

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Chokshi with Shri Biren Shah, ARFor Respondent: Smt.Aparna M. Agrawal, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80I

…erred to by the Hon'ble ITAT, Amritsar in the case of M/s. TRG Industries (supra). The Hon'ble Tribunal Ahmedabad has further considered the following two relevant judgements: (i) CIT vs. Radhe Developers, 341 ITR 403 (Guj.) (ii) GVPR Engineers Ltd. vs. ACIT, 21 Taxmann.com 25 (Hyd.) ITA No.1864/Ahd/2013 and 225.Ahd/2014 2.10 The Hon'ble Tribunal has succinctly brought out the difference between a “developer” and a “contractor” at para-13 of the order which is reproduced below for ready reference: “13. In the background of the above discussion, it can be summarized that an enterprise has to enter into an agreem…

Welspun Projects Ltd.(Formerly Known As Msk Projects (India) Ltd.), Baroda vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Baroda

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1864/AHD/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1864/Ahd/2013 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2005-06 & "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006-2007 Welspun Projects (Formerly Known Ito, Ward-4(1) As Msk Projects (India) Ltd. Vs Baroda. 707-708, Sterling Centre R.C.Dutt Road, Alkapuri Baroda 390 005. Pan : Aabcm 4107 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vartik Chokshi With Shri Biren Shah, Ar Revenue By : Smt.Aparna M. Agrawal, Dr

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Chokshi with Shri Biren Shah, ARFor Respondent: Smt.Aparna M. Agrawal, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80I

…erred to by the Hon'ble ITAT, Amritsar in the case of M/s. TRG Industries (supra). The Hon'ble Tribunal Ahmedabad has further considered the following two relevant judgements: (i) CIT vs. Radhe Developers, 341 ITR 403 (Guj.) (ii) GVPR Engineers Ltd. vs. ACIT, 21 Taxmann.com 25 (Hyd.) ITA No.1864/Ahd/2013 and 225.Ahd/2014 2.10 The Hon'ble Tribunal has succinctly brought out the difference between a “developer” and a “contractor” at para-13 of the order which is reproduced below for ready reference: “13. In the background of the above discussion, it can be summarized that an enterprise has to enter into an agreem…