Ltd. Vs CIT (1996) 159 ITR 624 (SC) (iii) M/s Greater Mohali Area Development Authority v. DCIT, Circle 6(1), Chandigarh (93 Taxmann.com 441)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. ARDEE INFRASTURCTURE PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3584/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaacit, Circle 1 (1), Vs. Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 16Th Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan, New Delhi. Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aaaca7927K) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Advocate Shri V. Rajkumar, Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Amisha Gupt, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 11.07.2024 Date Of Order : 06.09.2024 Order Per S.Rifaur Rahman,Am: The Assessee Has Filed Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short]/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Dated 28.07.2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit (A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.1,80,39,139/- Made On Account Of Edc

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Amisha Gupt, CIT DR

Section 43C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ACIT, Circle 1 (1), vs. Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 16th Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan, New Delhi. Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (PAN : AAACA7927K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri K. Sampath, Advocate Shri V. Rajkumar, Advocate REVENUE BY : Ms. Amisha Gupt, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 11.07.2024 Date of Order : 06.09.2024 ORDER PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,AM: The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner o…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. PAVITRAVATI GREENFIELDS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is treated as partly allowed in above terms

ITA 708/HYD/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Jan 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner Of Vs. Pavitravati Greenfields Income-Tax, P. Ltd., Hyderabad. Central Circle – 3(2), Hyderabad. Pan – Aaecp0216E (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai Assessee By: Shri K.C. Devdas Date Of Hearing: 06/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04/01/2022

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”: HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL CONFERENCE) BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner of Vs. Pavitravati Greenfields Income-tax, P. Ltd., Hyderabad. Central Circle – 3(2), Hyderabad. PAN – AAECP0216E (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue by: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai Assessee by: Shri K.C. Devdas Date of hearing: 06/10/2021 Date of pronouncement: 04/01/2022 O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A) – 12, Hyderabad’s order date…