ITO (E)- 1(1), Mumbai vs. Anusandhan Trust, Mumbai
In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed
ITA 6424/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2021AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Amarjit Singh (Jm)
For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: 11.08.2021
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)
…nts received from agencies to be considered as eligible income for section 11 of the I.T.Act, 1961 is covered by the following case laws:- i) CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (1983) (143 ITR 579) (Bom HC) ii) Little Tradition v. DDIT(E) (2009) (119 ITD 127) (Tdel) 6. It is further pleaded that other ground relating to interest income and depreciation Are consequential to the ground No.1 in assessee appeal. 7. As regards, the issue of deletion of disallowance of claim of deficit of Rs. 3,92,62,164/-( Rs.1,43,40,656/- of previous year plus Rs. 2,49,21,508/- brought forward from earlier years). It i…