Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ld v. DCIT

23 Taxmann.com 265High Court2012#677 most cited

What is Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ld v. DCIT authority for?

The rule of consistency does not override the correct application of law and should not be applied if it leads to an anomalous outcome.

147

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,459 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ld v. DCIT · rule of consistency · Section 143(3) · Section 200A · consistency not anomaly · Delhi High Court · 23 Taxmann.com 265 · assessment procedure · interest

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ld v. DCIT

S D Senior Secondary School, Ambala Cantt vs. ITO, TDS, Karnal

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7398/DEL/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, "द"ली अिधकरण "द"ली "द"ली "यायपीठ "द"ली "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “ए”, नई "यायपीठ नई नई "द"ली नई "द"ली "द"ली म"म"म"म" "द"ली IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI चावला, उपा"य" सम" सु"ी सुषमा सु"ी सुषमा चावला उपा"य" एवं एवं एवं डॉ एवं डॉ. बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार,लेखा लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य केकेकेके सम" सद"य सम" सम" सु"ी सु"ी सुषमा सुषमा चावला चावला उपा"य" उपा"य" डॉ डॉ बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, AM [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] Sl. ITA Nos. Name of Appellant Name of…

S D Senior Secondary School, Ambala Cantt vs. ITO, TDS, Karnal

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7397/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, "द"ली अिधकरण "द"ली "द"ली "यायपीठ "द"ली "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “ए”, नई "यायपीठ नई नई "द"ली नई "द"ली "द"ली म"म"म"म" "द"ली IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI चावला, उपा"य" सम" सु"ी सुषमा सु"ी सुषमा चावला उपा"य" एवं एवं एवं डॉ एवं डॉ. बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार,लेखा लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य केकेकेके सम" सद"य सम" सम" सु"ी सु"ी सुषमा सुषमा चावला चावला उपा"य" उपा"य" डॉ डॉ बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, AM [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] Sl. ITA Nos. Name of Appellant Name of…

S D Senior Secondary School, Ambala Cantt vs. ITO, TDS, Karnal

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7396/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, "द"ली अिधकरण "द"ली "द"ली "यायपीठ "द"ली "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “ए”, नई "यायपीठ नई नई "द"ली नई "द"ली "द"ली म"म"म"म" "द"ली IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI चावला, उपा"य" सम" सु"ी सुषमा सु"ी सुषमा चावला उपा"य" एवं एवं एवं डॉ एवं डॉ. बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार,लेखा लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य केकेकेके सम" सद"य सम" सम" सु"ी सु"ी सुषमा सुषमा चावला चावला उपा"य" उपा"य" डॉ डॉ बी बी आर आर आर आर कुमार कुमार BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, AM [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING] Sl. ITA Nos. Name of Appellant Name of…

Sika India Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir-12(2), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 911/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Oct 2019AY 2011-2012

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Sika India Pvt. Ltd………………………….……........................................................……………….…......Appellant Commercial Complex-Ii 620, Diamond Harbour Road Kolkata – 700 034 [Pan : Aaecs 1119 F] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-11(2), Kolkata……..................……….…....Respondent Appearances By: Shri Himanshu Sinha, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Dr. P.K. Srihari, Cit Sr. D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : July 31St, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 30Th, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member) Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Sika India Pvt. Ltd………………………….……........................................................……………….…......Appellant Commercial Complex-II 620, Diamond Harbour Road Kolkata – 700 034 [PAN : AAECS 1119 F] Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11(2), Kolkata……..................……….…....Respondent Appearances by: Shri Himanshu Sinha, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Dr. P.K. Srihari, CIT Sr…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Machino Plastics Ltd., Gurgaon

In the result we dismiss the appeal of the revenue and allow the 14

ITA 5899/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Dec 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiin Ita No. 5899/Del/2013 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) Dcit, Machino Plastics Ltd, Cirle-6(1), Room No.413, C.R. Plot No.3, Maruti Joint Venture Vs. Building, Complex, Delhi Gurgaon Road, New Delhi Gurgaon Pan:Aaacm6984G (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No 199/Del/2014 Machino Plastics Ltd, Vs Dcit, Plot No.3, Maruti Joint Venture Cirle-6(1), Room No.413, C.R. Complex, Delhi Gurgaon Road, Building, Gurgaon New Delhi Pan:Aaacm6984G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh.Gagan Kumar, Adv Revenue By Sh. P.Dam Kanunjna, Sr. Dr 16-11-2015 Date Of Hearing 11-12-2015 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 112Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 194CSection 40Section 40a

…AO as well as submitted that tax is required to be deducted by the assessee and disallowance is correctly made . he further submitted that COIT (A) has overlooked the decision of Honourable Delhi high court in case of Krishak Bharti Cooperative Limited V DCIt 23 Taxmann.com 265 where in it is held that rule of consistence should not create anomaly. 8. We have carefully considered the rival contention. We have also perused the facts of the present case and also the facts discussed by Coordinate bench in ITA no 2643 Del 2013 dated 09/05/2014 for AY 2009-10 which are similar. This was confirmed by both the parties a…