DCIT 3 (1), Bhopal vs. M/S Nhdc Ltd, Bhopal
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed, Cross appeal of the assesse is partly allowed for statistical purposes and CO is dismissed being infructuous
ITA 316/IND/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Dec 2023AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaninhdc Limited Dcit, 3(1) F-01, Nhdc Parisar, Shyamla Bhopal Vs. Hills Bhopal -462013 (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabcn 1732G Dcit, 3(1) Nhdc Limited Bhopal F-01, Nhdc Parisar, Vs. Shyamla Hills Bhopal -462013 (Appellant / Revenue) (Assessee) Pan: Aabcn 1732G
Section 143(3)Section 80I
…est income on advances to employees in para 2 & 3 as under: “2. The said order dated September 6, 2011, records that in an earlier decision dated November 15, 2006, in the case of the appellant, reported as Krishak Bharati Co-operative Ltd. v. Jt. CIT [2008] 300 ITR 92/[2007] 164 Taxman 406 (Delhi), service charges, equipment hire charges and interest on loans to employees, it was held would not be entitled to special deduction under section 80-1 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act", for short). On an appeal filed by the appellant-assessee, the Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal in respect of serv…