Kourani v. Union OF India

83 Taxmann.com 137High Court2017#16 most cited

What is Kourani v. Union OF India authority for?

The fee under Section 234E for late filing of TDS/TCS statements cannot be levied retrospectively by processing an intimation under Section 200A for defaults occurring before the amendment allowing such processing.

1,708

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,421 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Kourani v. Union of India · Section 234E · Section 200A · retrospective application · TDS late filing fee · TCS late filing fee · Section 200(3) · Section 206C · mistake apparent on record · intimation under Section 200A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kourani v. Union OF India

M/S. Emgee Engineering and Construction Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. ITO, TDS Ward - 2 (1), Chennai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2286/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2285, 2286 & 2287/Chny/2019 धनिाजरण वर्ज /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S. Emgee Engineering & The Income Tax Officer Construction Pvt. Limited, Tds Ward-2(1) New Address: Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building, 2Nd Floor, No.6/11, Brahadambal Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 Tds Circle, 121 M.G. Road, [Pan: Aadce 0318H] Chennai – 600 034 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/ Appellant By Mr. V.S. Jayakumar, Advocate : प्रत्यथी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2019 घोर्णा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan: These Are Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai In Ita Nos.70 To 72/18-19 Dated 31.05.2019 For The Assessment Year 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively.

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234E

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘डी’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री जॉजज माथन, न्याधयक सदस्य एवं श्री श्री एस. जयरामन, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.2285, 2286 & 2287/Chny/2019 धनिाजरण वर्ज /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/s. Emgee Engineering and The Income Tax Officer Construction Pvt. Limited, TDS Ward-2(1) New Address: Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building, 2nd Floor, No.6/11, Brahadambal Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 TDS Circle, 121 M.G. Road, [PAN: AADCE 03…

M/S. Emgee Engineering and Construction Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. ITO, TDS Ward - 2 (1), Chennai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2285/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2285, 2286 & 2287/Chny/2019 धनिाजरण वर्ज /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S. Emgee Engineering & The Income Tax Officer Construction Pvt. Limited, Tds Ward-2(1) New Address: Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building, 2Nd Floor, No.6/11, Brahadambal Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 Tds Circle, 121 M.G. Road, [Pan: Aadce 0318H] Chennai – 600 034 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/ Appellant By Mr. V.S. Jayakumar, Advocate : प्रत्यथी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2019 घोर्णा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan: These Are Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai In Ita Nos.70 To 72/18-19 Dated 31.05.2019 For The Assessment Year 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively.

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, JCIT
Section 200ASection 234E

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘डी’ न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री जॉजज माथन, न्याधयक सदस्य एवं श्री श्री एस. जयरामन, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.2285, 2286 & 2287/Chny/2019 धनिाजरण वर्ज /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/s. Emgee Engineering and The Income Tax Officer Construction Pvt. Limited, TDS Ward-2(1) New Address: Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building, 2nd Floor, No.6/11, Brahadambal Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034 TDS Circle, 121 M.G. Road, [PAN: AADCE 03…

Aarcity Builders P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5989/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Sh.R.K.Panda, Am आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.5386/Del/2017 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Sh. Rajiv Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Saras Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 195Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, "द"ली आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "द"ली "द"ली "यायपीठ "द"ली "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “जी "यायपीठ जी जी एवं जी एवं एवं ए”, नई एवं नई नई "द"ली नई "द"ली "द"ली म"म"म"म" "द"ली IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G & A’, NEW DELHI सुौी सुषमा चावला सुौी सुषमा चावला, , , , "याियक सदःय एवं "याियक सदःय एवं ौी ौी आर आर.के के.पांडा पांडा, लेखा सदःय के लेखा सदःय के सम" सम" सुौी सुषमा चावला सुौी सुषमा चावला "याियक सदःय एवं "याियक सदःय एवं ौी ौी आर आर के के पांडा पांडा लेखा सदःय के लेखा सदःय के सम" सम" BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM & SH.R.K.PANDA, AM आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील…

Aarcity Infrastructure P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle-73(1), Ghaziabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5990/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Sh.R.K.Panda, Am आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.5386/Del/2017 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Sh. Rajiv Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Saras Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 195Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, "द"ली आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "द"ली "द"ली "यायपीठ "द"ली "यायपीठ "यायपीठ “जी "यायपीठ जी जी एवं जी एवं एवं ए”, नई एवं नई नई "द"ली नई "द"ली "द"ली म"म"म"म" "द"ली IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G & A’, NEW DELHI सुौी सुषमा चावला सुौी सुषमा चावला, , , , "याियक सदःय एवं "याियक सदःय एवं ौी ौी आर आर.के के.पांडा पांडा, लेखा सदःय के लेखा सदःय के सम" सम" सुौी सुषमा चावला सुौी सुषमा चावला "याियक सदःय एवं "याियक सदःय एवं ौी ौी आर आर के के पांडा पांडा लेखा सदःय के लेखा सदःय के सम" सम" BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM & SH.R.K.PANDA, AM आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील…

Tulsi Gold, Mumbai vs. TDS -CPC- Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad

In the result, the captioned appeals for the AY 2013-14 are allowed

ITA 5230/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Sachhiyay Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, 73/75, 1St Floor, Sutariya Sector-3, Vaishali, Bhavan, Dhanji Street, Vs. Ghaziabad U.P. 201010 Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aadpc1166C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Nakoda Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, 202, 2 Mantri Smruti, Sector-3, Vaishali, Chitranjan Road, Vile Parle, Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aaapj8450H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Tulsi Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, Office No. 1 & 2, 1St Flr., Sector-3, Vaishali, 96/98, Sonawala Bldg., Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Dhanji Street, Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aafft4867M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Shree Mangal Palace, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, Shop No. 11, 11/13, Ladiwala, Sector-3, Vaishali, Chambers, Sheikh Memon Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Street, Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Pan : Aabpj7590F

Section 200ASection 234E

…Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fateh Raj Singhvi vs. Union of India (2016) 289 CTR 602 (Karnataka), whereas the Ld.CIT (A) has based his finding on the judgment of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani vs. Union of India 83 Taxmann.com 137. The Ld. DR further pointed out that the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has passed the said judgment after considering the judgment of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fateh Raj Singhvi vs. Union of India.(supra). The Ld. further submitted that the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of M/s Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan and ano…

Sachhyay Gold, Mumbai vs. TDS - CPC - Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad

In the result, the captioned appeals for the AY 2013-14 are allowed

ITA 5228/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Sachhiyay Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, 73/75, 1St Floor, Sutariya Sector-3, Vaishali, Bhavan, Dhanji Street, Vs. Ghaziabad U.P. 201010 Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aadpc1166C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Nakoda Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, 202, 2 Mantri Smruti, Sector-3, Vaishali, Chitranjan Road, Vile Parle, Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aaapj8450H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Tulsi Gold, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, Office No. 1 & 2, 1St Flr., Sector-3, Vaishali, 96/98, Sonawala Bldg., Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Dhanji Street, Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Pan : Aafft4867M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S Shree Mangal Palace, The Tds-Cpc, Aaykar Bhawan, Shop No. 11, 11/13, Ladiwala, Sector-3, Vaishali, Chambers, Sheikh Memon Vs. Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201010 Street, Zaveri Bazar, Mumbai - 400003 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Pan : Aabpj7590F

Section 200ASection 234E

…Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fateh Raj Singhvi vs. Union of India (2016) 289 CTR 602 (Karnataka), whereas the Ld.CIT (A) has based his finding on the judgment of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani vs. Union of India 83 Taxmann.com 137. The Ld. DR further pointed out that the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has passed the said judgment after considering the judgment of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fateh Raj Singhvi vs. Union of India.(supra). The Ld. further submitted that the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of M/s Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan and ano…