The Beml Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd, Bengaluru vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(2)(2), Bengaluru
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1107/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2019AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. The Beml Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd., The Income Tax M/S. Beml Bengaluru Officer, Vs. Complex, New Thippasandra, Ward 4 [2] [2], Bangalore – 560 075. Bangalore. Pan: Aaalt0689E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Narendra Sharma, Advocate Revenue By : Shri R.N. Siddappaji, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 12.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2019 O R D E R Per Shri A.K. Garodiathis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee & The Same Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-4, Bangalore Dated 31.01.2018 For Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under. “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax [Appeals] 4 [Hereinafter Called Short Cit(A)], Bengaluru In So Far It Is Against The Appellant Society Is Opposed To Law, Weight Of Evidence, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant Society'S Case. 2. The Ex-Parte Order Passed By The Learned Cit(A) Is Bad In Law As The Appellant Society Was Not Afforded A Reasonable Opportunity Of Hearing, Which Is In Grave Violation Of Principles Of Natural Justice On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 3. The Appellant Society No Assessable Income/Loss Of The Residential Layout Activities Transaction & Carried Out For No Gain/Loss Basis & U/S. 50C Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. (Hereinafter Called As Short Act) Not Applicable For Treating A Special Provision For Full Value Of Consideration On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 4. The Learned Cit (A), Is Not Justified In Law In Law In Confirming The Addition Made By The Learned Assessing Officer Of Rs. 1,34,08,000, Being Income Of Long Term Capital Gains Under The Provisions Of Section 50C Of The Act, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. Page 2 Of 3
For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Siddappaji, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 234BSection 50C
…of amount, towards layout cost, treated as layout work in progress on the assets side of the Balance Sheet. 9. Without prejudice to the right to seek waiver as per the parity of reasoning of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Karanvir Singh 349 ITR 692, the Appellant society denies itself liable to be charged to interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act under the facts and circumstances of the case. Further the levy of interest under section 234B it 234C of the Act is also bad in law as the period, rate, quantum and method of calculation adopted on which interest is levied are all not dis…