Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra

2 SCC 782Reported decision2011#23543 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2020.

Judgments citing Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra

MR. VENU vs. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed

WP/760/2020HC Karnataka24 Sept 2020

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice P. B. Bajanthri Writ Petition No.760/2020 (Gm - Res)

Section 14

…of Section 14(3) has not been considered by the Supreme Court in the decisions in ‘UNITED BANK OF INDIA VS. SATYAVATI TONDON AND ORS.’, (2010) 8 SSCC 110, ‘KANAIYALAL 13 LALCHAND SACHDEV AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS’, (2011) 2 SCC 782 and ‘AUTHORIZED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE AND ANOTHER VS. MATHEW K.C’, (2018) 3 SCC 85. It is pointed out that Supreme Court in ‘HARSHAD GOVARDHAN SONDAGAR VS. INTERNATIONAL ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS’, (2014) 6 SCC 1 by taking note of Section 14(3) of the Act has held that decision of the Chief Metropo…

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- vs. DLF GARDEN CITY INDORE PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY AYUSHI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS P. LTD.)

ITA/208/2016HC Delhi27 Apr 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17(1)

…ist that before availing remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution, a person must exhaust the remedies available under the relevant statute.” 7. The Supreme Court has categorically stated in Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 2 SCC 782 that “23. ....It is well settled that ordinarily relief under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person.” LPA No.206/2016, 207/2016, 208/2016 and 211/2016 Page 8 8. From the events of this case, it is apparent that before invoking the writ j…

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E) vs. PUSHPAWATI SINGHANIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR LIVER, RENAL & DIGESTIVE DISEASES

ITA/211/2016HC Delhi29 Mar 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Section 13(2)Section 13(4)Section 17(1)

…ist that before availing remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution, a person must exhaust the remedies available under the relevant statute.” 7. The Supreme Court has categorically stated in Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 2 SCC 782 that “23. ....It is well settled that ordinarily relief under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person.” LPA No.206/2016, 207/2016, 208/2016 and 211/2016 Page 8 8. From the events of this case, it is apparent that before invoking the writ j…

Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra (2 SCC 782) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax