Kamleshbhai Dharamshibhai Patel v. CIT

31 Taxmann.com 50High Court2013#1978 most cited

What is Kamleshbhai Dharamshibhai Patel v. CIT authority for?

Documents found in the possession of a searched person are presumed to belong to that person under Section 132(4A) and do not automatically belong to a third party merely because the transactions recorded therein pertain to or relate to such third party.

58

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,459 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Kamleshbhai Dharamshibhai Patel · Section 132 · Section 132(4A) · Section 153C · documents belonging to · documents pertaining to · search and seizure assessment · incriminating material · loose papers found during search · presumption of search material · third party assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kamleshbhai Dharamshibhai Patel v. CIT

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. M.N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3833/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 3832/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3833/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S M. N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., 8Th Floor, Statesman House, Tax, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcm0102D Assessee By : Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, Adv. Revenue By : Smt. Shefali Swroop, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Two Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 25.04.2014 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xii, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Shefali Swroop, CIT DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM and Ms. Suchitra Kamble, JM ITA No. 3832/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 ITA No. 3833/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Asstt. Commissioner of Income Vs M/s M. N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., 8th Floor, Statesman House, Tax, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCM0102D Assessee by : Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, Adv. Revenue by : Smt. Shefali Swroop, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 06.02.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM: These two appeals by the d…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. M.N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3832/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 3832/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ita No. 3833/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S M. N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., 8Th Floor, Statesman House, Tax, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcm0102D Assessee By : Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, Adv. Revenue By : Smt. Shefali Swroop, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Two Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 25.04.2014 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xii, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Shefali Swroop, CIT DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM and Ms. Suchitra Kamble, JM ITA No. 3832/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 ITA No. 3833/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Asstt. Commissioner of Income Vs M/s M. N. Securities Pvt. Ltd., 8th Floor, Statesman House, Tax, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCM0102D Assessee by : Sh. Shashi Tulsiyan, Adv. Revenue by : Smt. Shefali Swroop, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 06.02.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 27.02.2018 ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM: These two appeals by the d…