Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v. CIT
14 DTR 257High Court2008#2690 most cited
What is Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v. CIT authority for?
Additions to income cannot be made solely based on an assessee's admission, especially if it is a statement recorded under Section 132(4) at odd hours and subsequently retracted. Such admissions require corroborative evidence to be sustained.
43
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v CIT · Section 132(4) · retracted statement · admission · corroborative evidence · voluntary statement · search assessment · additions to income