Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v. CIT

14 DTR 257High Court2008#2690 most cited

What is Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v. CIT authority for?

Additions to income cannot be made solely based on an assessee's admission, especially if it is a statement recorded under Section 132(4) at odd hours and subsequently retracted. Such admissions require corroborative evidence to be sustained.

43

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v CIT · Section 132(4) · retracted statement · admission · corroborative evidence · voluntary statement · search assessment · additions to income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kailashben Mangarlal Chokshi v. CIT