Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT

130 Taxmann.com 250Reported decision2021#6237 most cited

What is Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT authority for?

The amendment to section 50C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by inserting the third proviso through the Finance Act, 2018, is curative and applies retrospectively. This means the tolerance band for the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value, introduced by this amendment, is applicable to earlier assessment years.

18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT · section 50C(1) · section 56(2)(vii)(b) · stamp duty valuation · circle rate · tolerance band · retrospective amendment · Finance Act 2018 · curative amendment · ITAT Mumbai

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT

Jayshriben Bharatbhai Patel, Vadodara vs. The ITO, Ward-1(3)(2), Vadodara

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 449/AHD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Guptaasstt.Year :2011-12 Jayshriben Bharatbhai Patel Ito, Ward-1(3)(2) Village :Garadi Vs Vadodara. Taluka :Sinor Vadodara 391 210 Pan : Bjupp 1758 E

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay R. Shah
Section 148Section 250(6)Section 50CSection 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘SMC’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Asstt.Year :2011-12 Jayshriben Bharatbhai Patel ITO, Ward-1(3)(2) Village :Garadi Vs Vadodara. Taluka :Sinor Vadodara 391 210 PAN : BJUPP 1758 E (Applicant) (Responent) Assesseeby : Shri Sanjay R. Shah : Shri Mukesh Thakwani, DR Revenue by सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 05/09/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronounc…

Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT (130 Taxmann.com 250) — Cited in 18 Judgments | BharatTax