JMK Exports v. ACIT

161 Taxmann.com 481High Court2024#15016 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 346,713 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 115BBESection 69ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 40A(3)Section 120Section 131

Issues it is cited on

addition under section 68section 40a(3)addition u/s 68section 145(3)section 40asection 115bbsection 145section 115bsection 115bbeunexplained cash creditdouble taxationsection 40

Judgments citing JMK Exports v. ACIT

Gurdas Mal Arora, Kanpur vs. The A O Circle-1(2)(1), Kanpur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes

ITA 412/LKW/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshragurdas Mal Arora V. The Assessing Officer, 21/L/4, Daboli, Circle-1(2)(1) Kanpur. 16/69, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Kanpur- 208001. Pan:Afepm4342J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Amit Kumar, Cit-Dr O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Gurdas Mal Arora v. The Assessing Officer, 21/L/4, Daboli, Circle-1(2)(1) Kanpur. 16/69, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Kanpur- 208001. PAN:AFEPM4342J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Advocate Respondent by: Shri Amit Kumar, CIT-DR O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.: (A). The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 31.10.2023 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal…

M/S Jhs Svendgaard Laboratories Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT CC-31, New Delhi

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 3454/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.M/S Jhs Svendgaard Vs. Dcit Laboratories Ltd. B1/E-23, Central Circle-31, New Mohan Cooperative Delhi Tuhglakabad, Badarpur, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aabcj5766G Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Gaurav Jain, Adv & Sh. Tarun Chanana, Adv Revenue By Ms.Amisha S. Gupt, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing 09/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 07/01/2026 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [‘Ld. Cit(A)’

Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 37

…1 M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laborotories Ltd. Vs. DCIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI (DELHI BENCH ‘E’ NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s JHS Svendgaard Vs. DCIT Laboratories Ltd. B1/E-23, Central Circle-31, New Mohan Cooperative Delhi Tuhglakabad, Badarpur, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AABCJ5766G Appellant Respondent Assessee by Sh. Gaurav Jain, Adv and Sh. Tarun Chanana, Adv Revenue by Ms.Amisha S. Gupt, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing 09/10/2025 Date of Pronouncement 07/01/2026 ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The present appeal is file…

Badri Prasad Vishwa Nath Jewels, Lucknow vs. ACIT-2, Lucknow

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 382/LKW/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow04 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 115BSection 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 40A(3)Section 68

…I.T.A. No.382/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2017-18 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.382/Lkw/2023 Assessment year:2017-18 Badri Prasad Vishwa Nath Vs. A.C.I.T.-II, Jewels, M-16 (Basement), Lucknow. Gole Market, Mahanagar, Lucknow-226006 PAN:AAHFB5813D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Akshay Agrawal, Advocate Respondent by Shri H. S. Usmani, CIT (D.R.) O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.382/Lkw/2023 has been filed by the assessee…

Kashi Nath Seth Sarraf Private Limited, Hardoi vs. ACIT, Sitapur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 88/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 145(3)Section 234BSection 44Section 68

…I.T.A. No.88/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH 'B', LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.88/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year:2017-18 Kashi Nath Seth Sarraf Private Vs. ACIT, Limited, Sitapur. C/o Sanjay Saxena, 12, Pratap Enclave, Bisrat G. T. Road, Shahjahanpur. PAN:AACCK3717F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Akshay Agarwal, Advocate Respondent by Shri Neeraj Kumar, CIT (D.R.) ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:Α.Μ. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.88/Lkw/2024 has been filed by t…

Mohan Lal Ashok Kumar Saraf, Jaipur vs. DCIT Cen Cir 1, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated hereinabove

ITA 879/JPR/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Nov 2024AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: Shri Ankit Totuka, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR MkWa- ,l-lhrky{eh] U;kf;dlnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHA LAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 879/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@AssessmentYear :2017-18 Mohan Lal Ashok Kumar Saraf cuke The DCIT Vs. 223, Johri Bazar Central Circle-1 Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AACFM 6432 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Ankit Totuka, Advocate jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Ms. Alka G…

Pradeep Kumar, Lucknow vs. ACIT-1, Lucknow

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 198/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow04 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G. D. Padamahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2017-18 Pradeep Kumar V. The Acit-1 A-1/46, Vikas Khand Lucknow Gomti Nagar Lucknow Pan:Ablpk8392B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Vijay Prakash Agrawal, Adv. Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 10 07 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 04 09 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Prakash Agrawal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI G. D. PADAMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Pradeep Kumar v. The ACIT-1 A-1/46, Vikas Khand Lucknow Gomti Nagar Lucknow PAN:ABLPK8392B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Vijay Prakash Agrawal, Adv. Respondent by: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date of hearing: 10 07 2024 Date of pronouncement: 04 09 2024 O R D E R PER SUBHASH MALGURIA, J.M.: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delh…

JMK Exports v. ACIT (161 Taxmann.com 481) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax