Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-16(1), New Delhi
ITA 1953/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: FixedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu, Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसुं.6997/म ुं/2019(धन.व. 2016-17) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 11(3)(1), Mumbai ...... अपीलाथी/Appellant बनाम Vs. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. 3Rd Floor, The Leela Galleria, Andheri ( East), Mumbai 400 059 ..... प्रधिवादी/Respondent Pan: Aaace-2175-M C.O. No.57/Mum/2019 Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai – 400 059 ...... Cross Objector बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ...... प्रधिवादी/Respondent Circle 11(3)(1), Mumbai.
For Appellant: Shri Niraj ShethFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, CIT-DR
Section 115
…n the form of payment of DDT? The nature of DDT first came for consideration before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Jayshree Tea and Industries Ltd. v. Union of India, (supra) and in the case of George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. v. Union of India, 292 ITR 322 (Gauhati). The assessee in these cases were companies engaged in the business of growing and manufacturing tea. The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 115-O introduced by the Finance Bill 1997. In terms of Rule 8(1) of the Rules income derived from the sale of tea grown by the assessee and 53 Special Bench - Total Oil I…