DCIT, Circle-1(1), Cuttack vs. M/S. Sonthalia Rice Mill, Cuttack
In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed
ITA 29/CTK/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 May 2022AY 2016-17
Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2016-17 Dcit, Circle-1(1), 1(1), Vs. M/S. Sonthalia Rice Mill, Plot M/S. Sonthalia Rice Mill, Plot Cuttack No.1554B, No.1554B, Bidanasi, Bidanasi, Cda, Cda, Cuttack Pan/Gir No. No.Aajfm 7681 C (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.K.Sheth M.K.Sheth, Ar Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Addl S.C.Mohanty, Addl Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 5/4/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 17 / 05/2022 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg G, Jm
For Appellant: Shri M.K.ShethFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Addl
Section 44A
…idering the judicial ratios, it is clear that no addition can be made merely on basis of electricity consumption formula. This P a g e 4 | 12 Assessment Year : 2016-17 view is also supported by the decisions of various Tribunals such as Janta Tiles Vs. ACIT (66 TTJ 695) (Jurisdictional Pune Bench); DCIT Kolapur Vs. J. D. Thote Dairies (Jurisdictional Pune Bench in ITA No 115/PN/2000 decision dated31/05/2011); Roop Niketan Vs. ACIT(90 TTJ 1097) (Mumbai Bench) and ITO Vs. Gurubachansingh Juneja (55 ITD 75). Respectfully following the above decisions and the facts & circumstances of the present case, I direct the A…