Jaipur Benches SMC ITO Ward- 5(2), Jaipur v. Shakuntala Agarwal 5

149 Taxmann.com 104Reported decision2023#22755 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

penny stock section 10(38)addition u/s 68 accommodation entry long term capital gain section 68 person company nfac total income business document

Judgments citing Jaipur Benches SMC ITO Ward- 5(2), Jaipur v. Shakuntala Agarwal 5

RACHNA GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 529/JODH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR. BEFORE: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Ι.Τ.Α. No. 529/Jodh/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Rachna Goyal J-2-C, Subhash Colony, Palace Road, Ratnada, Jodhpur. PAN. No. AJNPG2188H Appellant Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward 1(2), Jodhpur. Respondent Appellant by Sh. T.C. Gupta, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Karni Dan, Addl.CIT (Sr.DR Date of Hearing 07/05/2025 Date of Pronouncement 25/06/2025 PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.М. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), National Faceless Ap…

PARASMAL BHANDARI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed with no orders as to costs

ITA 95/JPR/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Aug 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Making The Impugned Addition & Not Providing Any Opportunity Of Cross Examination Which Is In Gross Violation Of Principle Of Natural Justice.

For Appellant: Shri Prateek Kedawat, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 10(38)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC’’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 95/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2014-15 cuke Shri Parasmal Bhandari The ITO Vs. 104, Vinayak Apartment, Chomu Circle Ward 6 (2) C-Scheme, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AFJPB 6961 K vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : Shri Prateek Kedawat, Advocate jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR l…

AMIT GOYAL HUF,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 437/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Harshit Agrawal (C.A.)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary ( Addl. CIT)

Section 10(38)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh]U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 437/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2015-16 Amit Goyal HUF cuke ITO, Vs. A-141, Vidyut Nagar, Ward-2(3), Jaipur. Ajmer Road, Jaipur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABHA 9214 K vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assessee by : Shri Harshit Agrawal (C.A.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Smt. M…