DCIT Cir 6(1), Mumbai vs. Bharat Bijlee Ltd, Mumbai
In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed
ITA 3217/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 May 2016AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma & Shri Pawan Singhassessment Year: 2009-10 Dcit. Cir. 6(1), M/S Bharat Bijlee Ltd. Room No. 506, 5Th Floor, 6Th Floor, Electric Mansion, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Appasahen Maratha Marg, Vs. Mumbai-20 Prabhadevi, Mumbai-400025. Pan: Aaacb2900K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S Bharat Bijlee Ltd. Dcit. Cir. 6(1), 6Th Floor, Electric Mansion, Room No. 506, 5Th Floor, Appasahen Maratha Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Mumbai-20 Prabhadevi, Mumbai-400025. Pan: Aaacb2900K (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Ronak G. Doshi (AR)For Respondent: Dr. Prabhakar Reddy (DR)
Section 145ASection 14ASection 234C
…)(Spl Bench) wherein it is held that for the purpose of section 145A the modvat element in opening stock should also be adjusted and the addition only to closing stock is not appropriate. Besides, the Bombay ITAT has held in the case of J.B.Chemicals v. ACIT (10 SOT 362) that for giving effect to Section 145A, the adjustment should be made not only to the closing stock but also to purchases. The assessee submits that the working shown in Tax audit report is in accordance with these two decisions and hence the addition made by the AO only to closing stock deserves to be deleted. Hence the assessee prays that the a…