ITR 22 9. Prem Chand Bansal vs. ITO (1999) 237 ITR 65 (del) 10. R. Seshmal v. ITO

221 Taxmann 209High Court2014#23702 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 350,364 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Sections most often in play

Section 143(2)Section 143(3A)Section 143(3B)Section 144 Section 144B Section 68

Judgments citing ITR 22 9. Prem Chand Bansal vs. ITO (1999) 237 ITR 65 (del) 10. R. Seshmal v. ITO

Saranga Anil Aggarwal, Mumbai vs. ACIT, Circle 14(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1654/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Dharan Gandhi, Advocate &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT/DR

Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Saranga Anil Aggarwal ACIT, Circle-14(1)(1), Mumbai 7th Floor, RNA Corporate Park, Vs. Kalanagar, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. PAN: AACPA 8301 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Dharan Gandhi, Advocate & Shri Bhadresh Doshi, CA Revenue by : Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT/DR Date of Hearing : 02.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 06.08.2024 O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, AM: This appeal of the assessee for the assessment ye…

Sumer Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 36, Mumbai

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Asst

ITA 812/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajendra, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.812/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Sumer Builders, Vs. The Dy. Cit Central 201, Commerce House, Circle-36 , 140, N.M. Road, Fort, 11/43, Ground Floor, Mumbai – 400023. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai- 400020. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaafs2829R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Shri. Vachaspati Tripathi

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ ‘एच’, मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H”, BENCH MUMBAI सव"ी राजे"", लेखा सद"य, एवं , राम लाल नेगी "या"यक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA, AM AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.812/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Sumer Builders, Vs. The Dy. CIT Central 201, Commerce House, Circle-36 , 140, N.M. Road, Fort, 11/43, Ground Floor, Mumbai – 400023. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai- 400020. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAFS2829R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee by : Shri. Nishit Gandhi रा…

M/S Petronet Lng Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1197/DEL/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri G.C. Gupta & Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy

For Appellant: Shri C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vikram Sahay, Sr. DR

Section 156

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : “F” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No: 1197/Del/2011 AY : - 2004-05 Petronet LNG Ltd., vs. DCIT World Trade Centre Circle 14(1) 1st Floor, Babar Lane New Delhi. New Delhi. (PAN AAACP8148D) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate, Shri R.P. Mall, Advocate Respondent by :Shri Vikram Sahay, Sr. DR Date of Hearing :09.7.2015 Date of pronouncement :30.9. 2015 O R D E R PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This is an appeal file by the assesse…