ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd.

92 Taxmann.com 361Supreme Court of India2018#485 most cited

What is ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd. authority for?

Reassessment under Section 147/148 is invalid if it constitutes a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without any fresh tangible material, especially after the assessee made a full and truthful disclosure during the original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3).

194

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,518 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd. · Section 147 · Section 148 · Section 143(3) · mere change of opinion · reopening of assessment · reassessment validity · tangible material · full disclosure · scrutiny assessment · reason to believe

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd.

P E Rajkumar, Chennai vs. ITO Non Corp Ward 17(4), Chennai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 588/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.588/Chny/2018 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Vs The Income Tax Officer, Shri Pe Rajkumar, No.F-3/12, 6Th Main Road, Non-Corporate Ward 17(4), Mogappair Eri Scheme, Chennai – 34. Mogappair East, Chennai – 600 037. Pan: Ahbpr1143B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Ms. Sumathy Venkatraman, JCITFor Respondent: 19.09.2018
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250(6)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद"य एवं "ी धु"वु" आर.एल रे"ी, "याियक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.588/Chny/2018 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Vs The Income Tax Officer, Shri PE Rajkumar, No.F-3/12, 6th Main Road, Non-Corporate Ward 17(4), Mogappair Eri Scheme, Chennai – 34. Mogappair East, Chennai – 600 037. PAN: AHBPR1143B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri Naga Prasad,CA अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant b…

DCIT-9(1)(2), Mumbai vs. Atc India Tower Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 2620/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Pawan Singhin The Matter Of Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax -9(2) Room No. 260A, 2Nd Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020 ------- Appellant/ Revenue (Revenue Through Sh. Rajesh Kumar Yadav Sr Dr Versus M/S Atc India Tower Corporation, 404, 4Th Floor, Skyline Icon, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai- 400049 Pan: Aajcs7669H -------- Respondent / Assessee (Assessee Through Sh. Satyen Sethi Advocate Reserve For Order : 02.05.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2018 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income -Tax Act Per Pawan Singh; 1. This Appeal By Revenue Under Section 253 Of Income-Tax Act Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner (Appeals)-16, Mumbai Dated 22Nd January 2016, Which Arise From Assessment Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 147 Dated 25Th March 2013 For Assessment Year

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL“A”BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER In the matter of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -9(2) Room No. 260A, 2nd Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020 ------- Appellant/ Revenue (Revenue through Sh. Rajesh Kumar Yadav Sr DR Versus M/s ATC India Tower Corporation, 404, 4th Floor, Skyline Icon, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai- 400049 PAN: AAJCS7669H -------- Respondent / Assessee (Assessee through Sh. Satyen Sethi Advocate Reserve for order : 02.05.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 31.07.2018 Order unde…