ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd.

30 SOT 55Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2009#1428 most cited

What is ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. authority for?

When computing the deduction under Sections 10A or 10AA, if certain expenses (like those incurred in foreign currency or communication expenses) are excluded from 'export turnover' in the numerator, the same expenses must also be excluded from 'total turnover' in the denominator to ensure consistent calculation.

80

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2023.

Also referred to as

ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. · Section 10A · Section 10AA · export turnover · total turnover · computation of deduction · STPI unit · software technology park · exclusion of expenses · foreign currency expenses · communication expenses · eligible business · tax benefit

Also reported as

313 ITR 353121 TTJ 865

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd.

M/S. Bayer Vapi Private Ltd. (Formerly Known As Bilag Industries P. Ltd.), Vapi vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi Circle, Vapi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for A

ITA 1769/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri O.P. Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No’S.2886/Ahd/2010, 794/Ahd/2014 & 1769/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2006-07, 2009-10 & 2011-12 बनाम M/S. Bilag Industries Pvt. Ltd. , Addl. Cit Range- ( Now Known As M/S. Bayer Vapi Vs. Vapi, Range Vapi Private Limited) 306/3,Phase-Ii Shivam Commercial Complex Gidc-1, Vapi Gujarat National Highway No 8 Vapi Pan: Aabcb 2100 L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri A. Gopalakrishnan Aiyer - Ca िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri O. P. Singh Cit (D.R.) राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By 26.09.2019 सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 24.10.2019 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R Per O. P. Meena, Am: 1. The Above Captioned Three Appeals For The Assessment Year 2006-07, 2009-10 & 2011-12 By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Assessment Order Passed U/S. 143(3) R.W.S. 144C Dated 28.07.2010 & Dated 15.01.2014 Respectively Under The Income-Tax Act,1961 ['The Act' For Short] On The Direction Of Drp By The Addl. Cit Range-Vapi Range Vapi (Herein After Referred As The Ao) & The Appeal For The Assessment Year 2011-12 By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit (A) Dated 29.04.2016. Since The Common Issues Are Involved In These Appeals Therefore, These Were Heard Together & Consolidated Order Is Being Passed As Under: It(Tp)A No.2886/Ahd/2010/A.Y. 2006-07/ By The Assessee: 2. Ground Nos.1 Is General In Nature & Do Not Require Adjudication.

For Appellant: 2. Ground Nos.1 is general in nature and do not require adjudication
Section 143(3)

…(SC) held that sales tax and Excise duty will not form part of total turnover for the purpose of deduction under section 80HHC. The learned Counsel for the assessee further submitted that the Chennai Special Bench in the case of ITO v. Sak Soft Limited [2009] 30 SOT 55 ( Chennai) (SB) held that freight telecom charges or insurance are to be excluded, both from export turnover and from total turnover, for the purpose of computation of deduction under section 10B (4) of the Act. 16. Per contra, Ld. D.R. relied on order of the Ld. DRP. 17. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on rec…

ACIT Corporate Circle 6(1), Chennai vs. Sanmina Sci Technology India Pvt Ltd., Kancheepuram

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 917/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.917/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Sanmina Sci Technology India Pvt. Income Tax, Corporate Circle 6(1), Vs. Ltd., Oz-1, Sipcot Hi-Tech Sez, Aayakar Bhavan, Wanaparthy Block, Oragadam, Sriperumbudur Taluk, 7Th Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Chennai 34. Kancheepuram Dt., Tamil Nadu 602 105. [Pan:Aakcs8133K] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Jcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 15, Chennai Dated 30.11.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2013-14. In This Appeal, The Revenue Has Raised Two Effective Grounds Viz., (I) The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Directing The Assessing Officer To Exclude The Expenses Incurred In Foreign Currency Both From Export Turnover As Well As From The Total Turnover & (Ii) The Ld. Cit(A)

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)

…omputing deduction under section 10AA of the Act. After considering the submissions of the assessee and since the Department preferred further appeal before the Hon’ble Madras High Court against the decision of the Tribunal in the case of ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. 313 ITR 353 (SB), the Assessing Officer excluded the above expenses from export turnover alone for the purpose of deduction under section 10AA of the Act. 3. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the submissions of the assessee and by following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. (sup…