ITO v. Pritam Juice

124 ITD 237Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2010#22241 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 350,364 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2019.

Judgments citing ITO v. Pritam Juice

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 4202/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year: 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No. 226/Del/2011 (Arising Ita No.2720/Del/2011) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.E. Dastur, Sr. Advocate and Shri Ankit Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

…ain amount to AAI towards renovation and alterations carried out in premises on its behalf. The expenditure being capital in nature not allowable. The AAI has offered the said amount as income is immaterial consideration for the assessee; ITO vs. Pritam Juice 124 ITD 237. • Rent paid by Lessee for acquiring leasehold right to extract minerals as one fixed amount for entire lease is Capital Expenditure, and proportionate amount of Rent not allowable as deduction; Enterprising Enterprises vs. DCIT 293 ITR 437 (SC). • Treatment in Books of Accounts vs. Nature of Expense: The treatment of particular expense or a prov…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2720/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year: 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit, Vs. M/S. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(1) Udaan Bhawan, Terminal 1B, New Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaccd3570F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No. 226/Del/2011 (Arising Ita No.2720/Del/2011) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.E. Dastur, Sr. Advocate and Shri Ankit Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

…ain amount to AAI towards renovation and alterations carried out in premises on its behalf. The expenditure being capital in nature not allowable. The AAI has offered the said amount as income is immaterial consideration for the assessee; ITO vs. Pritam Juice 124 ITD 237. • Rent paid by Lessee for acquiring leasehold right to extract minerals as one fixed amount for entire lease is Capital Expenditure, and proportionate amount of Rent not allowable as deduction; Enterprising Enterprises vs. DCIT 293 ITR 437 (SC). • Treatment in Books of Accounts vs. Nature of Expense: The treatment of particular expense or a prov…

ITO v. Pritam Juice (124 ITD 237) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax