ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.

117 ITD 169Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2009#659 most cited
151

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ITO v. Daga Capital Management · Daga Capital Management · 117 ITD 169 · Section 14A · Rule 8D · dividend income · shares as stock-in-trade · exempt income · business of dealing in shares · disallowance of expenditure · Special Bench ITAT

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.

Piramal Corporate Services Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cir 7(1), Mumbai

ITA 1284/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Sh.Joginder Singh & Rajendraआयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./1284/Mum/2014,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2010-11 आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. Dcit-Circle-7(1), (Now Known As Piramal Corporate Services Ltd.) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,New Marine Piramal Tower, Peninsula Corporate Park, Lines, Mumbai-400020. Vs. Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel(W) Mumbai-400013. Pan:Aaacj 5669 H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Sanjay Bare-Dr Assessee By: S/Shri Yogesh Thar & Manthan Shah –Ar.S सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 19.05.2016 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 20.07.2016 आयकर आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम,1961 क" अिधिनयम क" क" धारा क" धारा धारा 254(1)केकेकेके अ"तग"त धारा अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार Per Rajendra, Am- अनुसार Challenging The Order Dt.30.12.2013 Of Cit(A)-13,Mumbai The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal. Assessee –Company, Engaged In The Business Of Providing Various Consultancy Services Like Management Consultancy Services, Corporate Strategy Services To Its Group & Is Also Making Investment In Other Companies. It Filed Its Return Of Income 13.10.2010, Declaring Total Income At Rs.15.29Crores .The Assessment Order U/S.143(3) Of The Act, Was Passed On 31.12.2012, Determining The Total Income Of The Assessee At Rs. 19.67 Crores.

For Appellant: S/Shri Yogesh Thar and Manthan Shah –AR.sFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Bare-DR
Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 254(1)Section 36(1)(iii)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई “सी मुंबई सी सी ” खंडपीठ सी खंडपीठ खंडपीठ खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal “C”Bench Mumbai सव"ी जोिग"दर "सह, "याियक सद"य एवं राजे"", लेखा सद"य Before S/Sh.Joginder Singh,Judicial Member & Rajendra,Accountant Member आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./1284/Mum/2014,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2010-11 आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/s. Piramal Enterprises ltd. DCIT-Circle-7(1), (Now known as Piramal Corporate Services Ltd.) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,New Marine Piramal tower, Peninsula…

ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai vs. Mahindra Infrastructural Projects P. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 5827/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. C. Sharma, Am & Shri Pawan Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.5827/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Dy. Cit, Circ.-6(3), Mahindra Infrastructural Projects R. No. 522, 5Th Floor, Pvt. Ltd. (Now Merged With Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Andromeda Investment & Finance बनाम/ Mumbai-400 020 Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. 5Th Floor, Mahindra Towers, G. M. Bhosale Marg, P. K. Kurne Chowk, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacm 3575 B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri D. P. Reddy ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Rajesh Athawale सुनवाई क" तार"ख / : 17.3.2016 Date Of Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख / : 07.04.2016 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Pawan Singh, Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A)-8, Mumbai Dated 09.7.2013 For A.Y. 2005-06. The Sole Ground In The Present Appeal Is Against The Disallowance U/S. 14A R/W Rule 8D Of The Act, On The Pretext That There Is Diversion Of Funds To Subsidiary Company.

For Appellant: Shri D. P. ReddyFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Athawale
Section 14ASection 57

…for determining the amount of expenditure incurred in relation 4 Dy. CIT vs. Mahindra Infrastructural Projects Pvt. Ltd. to exempt income. The operation of this rule has been declared as retrospective by the Spl. Bench of the ITAT in Daga Capital Management (117 ITD 169). It has also been held in the same case that expenditure has to be disallowed even if no income by way of dividend is earned during the year. In view of the above, Rule BD has to be applied in the case of the appellant and the proportionate expenditure in relation to exempt income determined. The AO has followed a method which is not fully conso…

M/S. Overseas Carpets Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5062/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Overseas Carpets Ltd, V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of 1-1/16, Shanti Mohan House, Income Tax, Circle-13 (1), Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi (Pan: Aaaco0404H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Ms. Charu Goyal, Ca Respondent By Sh. P. Dam Kanunjana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24/02/2016 Date Of Pronouncement 22/03/2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: This Appeal Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Dated 13/07/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xvi, New Delhi For Assessment Year 2008-09 Raising Following Grounds: 1. That The Cit Appeals Has Erred In Determining The Total Income At Rs. 1,63,91,923/-. 2. That The Ld. Cit Appeals Of Income Tax Has Erred In Making Disallowance Of Rs. 13,91,082/- Under Section 14A Of The Act, Which Is Bad In Law & Against Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 3. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Amend, Amplify Or Delete Any Or All Of The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or At The Time Of Hearing.

Section 143(3)Section 14A

…laim, the assessee cited number of cases before the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal). The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals), however, relying on the decision of the Tribunal, Mumbai bench in the case of M/s Daga Capital Management Private Limited 312 ITR 1 and judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of M/s Dhanuka and sons v/s CIT Central-1 in ITA No. 633 of 2004, confirmed the disallowance made by the AO under section 14A of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. The only effective ground of appeal is in respect of disallowance of Rs. 13,91,082/-under s…