Indowind Energy Limited v. Wescare (India) Limited And Another

5 SCC 306Reported decision2012#15973 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Judgments citing Indowind Energy Limited v. Wescare (India) Limited And Another

M/s. Kausalya Shelters Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

ITTA/274/2022HC Telangana02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 34

…OMP(COMM) 274/2022 Page 1 of 76 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 29, 2023 + O.M.P. (COMM) 274/2022, I.A. 10459/2022 DAG PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Mr. Aditya Vikram, Ms. Sanjukta Kaushik & Mr. Shashwat Dhyani, Advs. versus RAVI SHANKAR INSTITUTE FOR MUSIC AND PERFORMING ARTS ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Dhilip Philip, Mr. Dhiraj Philip, Mr.…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3, vs. SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.

ITA/461/2018HC Delhi17 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 9

…O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 460-461/2018 Page 1 of 79 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 13.03.2020 Pronounced on: 22.06.2020 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 460/2018 and I.A. Nos. 9313/2019, 9356/2019 STERLING AND WILSON INTERNATIONAL FZE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Farida Dholakawala, Mr. Sameer Patel, Mr. Shubhanshu Gupta, Mr. Kabir Chilwar, Ms. Sanjana Bakshi and Mr. Hitesh Singhvi, Advocates. Versus…

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-3 vs. HFCL INFOTEL LTD.

ITA/460/2018HC Delhi16 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 9

…O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 460-461/2018 Page 1 of 79 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 13.03.2020 Pronounced on: 22.06.2020 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 460/2018 and I.A. Nos. 9313/2019, 9356/2019 STERLING AND WILSON INTERNATIONAL FZE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Farida Dholakawala, Mr. Sameer Patel, Mr. Shubhanshu Gupta, Mr. Kabir Chilwar, Ms. Sanjana Bakshi and Mr. Hitesh Singhvi, Advocates. Versus…

PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL - 2) vs. TANVIR COLLECTIONS PVT. LTD

ITA/264/2018HC Delhi28 Feb 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 34

…of India, AIR 1960 SC 588, Jivarajbhai Ujamshi Sheth v. Chintamanrao Balaji, AIR 1965 SC 214 and Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1984) 4 SCC 679: AIR 1985 SC 1156)” 45. In Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306, the Court held: (SCC pp. 320-21, paras 43-45) “43. In any case, assuming that Clause 9.3 was capable of two interpretations, the view taken by the arbitrator was clearly a possible if not a plausible one. It is not possible to say that the arbitrator had travelled outside his jurisdiction, or that the view taken by him was against the term…

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI vs. DHARA VEGETABLE OIL & FOODS CO. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE LTD.)

ITA/71/2018HC Delhi23 Jan 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 34

…of India, AIR 1960 SC 588, Jivarajbhai Ujamshi Sheth v. Chintamanrao Balaji, AIR 1965 SC 214 and Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1984) 4 SCC 679: AIR 1985 SC 1156)” 45. In Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran, (2012) 5 SCC 306, the Court held: (SCC pp. 320-21, paras 43-45) “43. In any case, assuming that Clause 9.3 was capable of two interpretations, the view taken by the arbitrator was clearly a possible if not a plausible one. It is not possible to say that the arbitrator had travelled outside his jurisdiction, or that the view taken by him was against the terms o…

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Kalyani Wines

In the result, I find this appeal bereft of merit and accordingly,

ITTA/6/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Section 11Section 37

…Nigam Ltd. reported in (2019) 7 SCC 236, adverting to the previous decisions of this Court in McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. reported in (2006) 11 SCC 181 and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran reported in (2012) 5 SCC 306], wherein it has been observed that an Arbitral Tribunal must decide in accordance with the terms of the contract, but if a term of the contract has been construed in a reasonable manner, then the award ought not to be set aside on this ground, it has been held thus: [Parsa Kente Collieries Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.,…

Indowind Energy Limited v. Wescare (India) Limited And Another (5 SCC 306) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax