Index One Trade Con P. Ltd. v. DCIT

97 Taxmann.com 174Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2018#9180 most cited

What is Index One Trade Con P. Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act applies in the year in which the property was sold by the assessee and not the year in which it was registered, especially when the assessee has already entered into an agreement to sell and accounted for the sales in earlier years.

12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Index One Trade Con P. Ltd. v. DCIT · 97 Taxmann.com 174 · ITAT 2018 · Section 43CA · Stamp duty value · Year of registration · Year of sale · Agreement to sale · Corresponding sales

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Index One Trade Con P. Ltd. v. DCIT

M/S Spytech Buildcon, Jaipur vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6, Jaipur

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 255/JPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Jul 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 255/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2014-15 M/S Spytech Buildcon, Cuke A.C.I.T., Vs. 501, Geetansh Class Of Pearl, Circle-6, K-48-49, Income Tax Colony, Jaipur. Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Abefs 2767 H Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Rohan Sogani (Ca) & Shri Rajeev Sogani (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jcit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 21/06/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/07/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Cit(A)- 2, Jaipur Dated 25/01/2019 For The A.Y. 2014-15 In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act), Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Taken. “1. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ld. Ao In Making Addition Of Rs. 5,39,711/- U/S 43Ca Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Action Of Ld. Cit(A) Is Illegal, Unjustified, Arbitrary & Against The Facts Of The Case. Relief May Please Be Granted By Deleting The Said Addition Of Rs. 5,39,711/-.

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 143(3)Section 43CSection 50C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 255/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2014-15 M/s Spytech Buildcon, cuke A.C.I.T., Vs. 501, Geetansh Class of Pearl, Circle-6, K-48-49, Income Tax Colony, Jaipur. Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABEFS 2767 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Rohan Sog…