(Smt.) Anju Singh, Lucknow vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow
In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09
ITA 396/LKW/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69
…Road, Lucknow is not justified and the unexplained investment in various year shall be estimated by considering the valuation as made by the Valuation Officer in the respective years. Further, it has been held in Income-tax Officer v. Ram Nath Aggarwal [2004] 2 SOT 471 (ITAT ASR. Bench) (SMC) that the valuation of an asset is not an exact science. Mathematical calculation 'is not possible. The valuation of the immovable property is also estimated on the basis of the facts and circumstances. Therefore, it could not be said that whatever the Valuation Officer had stated was final word in the matter. The word 'estim…