INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE v. ROBERT BOSCH INDIA LTD.

50 Taxmann.com 275High Court2014#25170 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2023.

Judgments citing INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE v. ROBERT BOSCH INDIA LTD.

Orchasp Limited, Hyderabad vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the Tax Case Appeals are dismissed and the substantial questions of law are answered against the Revenue

ITA 182/HYD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyassessment Year: 2011-12 Orchasp Limited Vs. Dy. Cit Hyderabad Circle 1(2) Pan:Aabcc4776F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca Revenue By: Shri B. Yadagiri, Dr Date Of Hearing: 13/04/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/04/2023 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 23/03/2022 Of The Learned Cit (A)- Nfac, Relating To A.Y. 2011-12. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Appellate Order Passed By The Cit(A) Is Erroneous Both On Facts & In Law To The Extent The Order Is Prejudicial To The Interest Of The Appellant. 2. The Cit(A) Ought To Have Appreciated The Fact That The Amount Of Investment Made Is Completely In Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company Which Is Revenue In Nature & Not A Capital Expenditure. 3. The Ld. Cit(A) Ought To Have Accepted The Investments Written Off Of Rs.3,60,72,141/- Since The Said Amount Was Not Received From The Third Party To The Subsidiary & Thus, The Same Amount Was Written Off By The Virtue Of The Circular No. 69 Dt. 27-07-2011 Issued By Rbi.

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri B. Yadagiri, DR
Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(c)Section 37Section 37(1)

…ITA 182 of 2022 Orchasp Ltd आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R.K. Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2011-12 ORCHASP LIMITED Vs. Dy. CIT Hyderabad Circle 1(2) PAN:AABCC4776F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CA Revenue by: Shri B. Yadagiri, DR Date of hearing: 13/04/2023 Date of pronouncement: 20/04/2023 ORDER Per R.K. Panda, A.M This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23/03/2022 of the learned CIT (A)- NFAC, r…

M/S Open Sillicon Research Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-5(1)(2), Bengaluru

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2716/BANG/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalem/S. Open Silicon Research Pvt. Ltd. 139/26, Ground Floor, Amar Jyothi Layout, Domlur Intermediate Ring Road, Bengaluru-560071. … Appellant Pan: Aaaco 5915 B Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 5(1)(2), Bengaluru. … Respondent Appellant By : Shri Prashanth G.S., C.A. Respondent By : Swapna Das, Jcit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 06/05/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 12/06/2019 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm : The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Cit(A), Bangalore Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Income- Tax Act,1961 ['The Act' For Short].

For Appellant: Shri Prashanth G.S., C.AFor Respondent: Swapna Das, JCIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 32

…/monthly in US dollars and the license fee effective from 2011 to 2014 spread over years and no renewal of license fee. The learned AR relied on the decision of the jurisdictional Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of CIT vs. Robert Bosch India Ltd. (50 Taxmann.com 275). The learned AR emphasized that such fee is a revenue expenditure. When a query was raised to AR to elaborate the nature of software license fee whether it is application software or otherwise there is no clarity on disputed matters. Even the revenue could not support with explanations and reasons except mentioning that it is capital expe…

INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE v. ROBERT BOSCH INDIA LTD. (50 Taxmann.com 275) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax