(ii) CIT v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwala

9 Taxmann.com 249High Court2011#5848 most cited

What is (ii) CIT v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwala authority for?

When documents or messages are seized under section 132(4A) of the Income Tax Act, a presumption arises against the assessee, who must then provide a plausible explanation to rebut it.

20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwala · section 132(4A) · section 292C · seized documents · presumption · rebuttal · plausible explanation · on-money · dumb documents · loose papers

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing (ii) CIT v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwala

(ii) CIT v. Naresh Kumar Aggarwala (9 Taxmann.com 249) — Cited in 20 Judgments | BharatTax