Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT

47 Taxmann.com 341Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2014#7600 most cited

What is Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Advances given for business purposes, even if not returned, are allowable as expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Idea Cellular Ltd. · Section 37 · business expenditure · advance not returned · capital vs revenue · ITAT Mumbai

Also reported as

67 SOT 158

Sections most often in play

Section 10(38)Section 115BBESection 36(1)(vii)Section 37Section 68Section 69C

Issues it is cited on

section 100profit split methodbright line testresale price methodsection 36(l)(va)amp expendituresection 92esection 92(1)cost plus methodfar analysiscorporate guaranteeright to receive

Judgments citing Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT

Rose Serviced Apartments (India) Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle-21(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed as above

ITA 4041/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 115BSection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 4041/Del/2019, A.Y. 2015-16 Rose Serviced Apartments Assistant Commissioner (India) Pvt. Ltd., of Income Tax, 5-E, Local shopping Centre, v/s Circle-21(2), Masjid Moth, Greater Kailash, C. R. Building, I P Estate Part-II, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AAACP2712M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Abhishek Kumar Jain, CA Sh. Shivam Bansal, CA Respondent by Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 20/02/2025 Date of Pronouncement 20/05/202…

Tmf Holding Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT -1, Mumbai

ITA 1628/MUM/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Bletmf Holdings Ltd., V. Pr.Cit – 1 {Formerly Known As Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,} 3Rd Floor, Room No. 330 10Th Floor, 106 A & B Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Maker Chamber-Iii Mumbai - 400020 Nariman Point, Mumbai Pan: Aacct4644A (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Nikhil Tiwari Assessee By : Department By : Shri S.N. Kabra

For Appellant: Department byFor Respondent: Shri S.N. Kabra
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 47

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER TMF Holdings Ltd., v. Pr.CIT – 1 {Formerly Known as Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,} 3rd Floor, Room No. 330 10th Floor, 106 A & B Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Maker Chamber-III Mumbai - 400020 Nariman Point, Mumbai PAN: AACCT4644A (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Nikhil Tiwari Assessee by : Department by : Shri S.N. Kabra Date of Hearing : 28.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 22.04.2022 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee…

M/S. Dabur India Ltd., New Delhi vs. Addl.CIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6525/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anupam Kant Garg, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 80ISection 92CSection 92E

…ia Pvt. Ltd.: ITA No. 1233/ 2011 (Del. HC); viii) JCIT v. Hero Honda Finlease Ltd.: I 15 TTJ 752 (Del ITAT) (TM); ix) Aishwarya Rai v. DCIT: ITA No. 1159/Mum/04: (Mum ITAT); x) Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT: 65 SOT 15 (Mum.); xi) Advik Hi tech (P.) Ltd v. AC1T: 67 SOT 158 (Pune). 147. Referring to the following decisions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that where income is wrongly offered by an assessee or on previously asserted legal stand, it would not operate as estoppel against the assessee to revise such stand and make a legitimate claim otherwise entitled in law (No estoppel in law):- i) CIT v. S…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Dabur India Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6256/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anupam Kant Garg, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 80ISection 92CSection 92E

…ia Pvt. Ltd.: ITA No. 1233/ 2011 (Del. HC); viii) JCIT v. Hero Honda Finlease Ltd.: I 15 TTJ 752 (Del ITAT) (TM); ix) Aishwarya Rai v. DCIT: ITA No. 1159/Mum/04: (Mum ITAT); x) Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT: 65 SOT 15 (Mum.); xi) Advik Hi tech (P.) Ltd v. AC1T: 67 SOT 158 (Pune). 147. Referring to the following decisions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that where income is wrongly offered by an assessee or on previously asserted legal stand, it would not operate as estoppel against the assessee to revise such stand and make a legitimate claim otherwise entitled in law (No estoppel in law):- i) CIT v. S…

M/S. Dabur India Ltd., New Delhi vs. Addl.CIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3241/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anupam Kant Garg, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 80ISection 92CSection 92E

…ia Pvt. Ltd.: ITA No. 1233/ 2011 (Del. HC); viii) JCIT v. Hero Honda Finlease Ltd.: I 15 TTJ 752 (Del ITAT) (TM); ix) Aishwarya Rai v. DCIT: ITA No. 1159/Mum/04: (Mum ITAT); x) Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT: 65 SOT 15 (Mum.); xi) Advik Hi tech (P.) Ltd v. AC1T: 67 SOT 158 (Pune). 147. Referring to the following decisions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that where income is wrongly offered by an assessee or on previously asserted legal stand, it would not operate as estoppel against the assessee to revise such stand and make a legitimate claim otherwise entitled in law (No estoppel in law):- i) CIT v. S…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Dabur India Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3114/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anupam Kant Garg, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 80ISection 92CSection 92E

…ia Pvt. Ltd.: ITA No. 1233/ 2011 (Del. HC); viii) JCIT v. Hero Honda Finlease Ltd.: I 15 TTJ 752 (Del ITAT) (TM); ix) Aishwarya Rai v. DCIT: ITA No. 1159/Mum/04: (Mum ITAT); x) Idea Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT: 65 SOT 15 (Mum.); xi) Advik Hi tech (P.) Ltd v. AC1T: 67 SOT 158 (Pune). 147. Referring to the following decisions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that where income is wrongly offered by an assessee or on previously asserted legal stand, it would not operate as estoppel against the assessee to revise such stand and make a legitimate claim otherwise entitled in law (No estoppel in law):- i) CIT v. S…

DCIT 7(3), Mumbai vs. Tata Sky Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the Asst

ITA 3972/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3214/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3215/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner Of Unit 301, To 305, 3 Rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [Now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner Of Income – Mumbai-400 098 Tax, Range 16(1)] Mumbai .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aagcs9294M Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3971/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3972/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S Tata Sky Ltd. Income Tax 7(3) 34D Floor, C-1, Wadia 6Th Room No. 615, Floor, International Centre, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Bombay Dyeing), Mumbai-400 020 Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbi-400 025 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Senior Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29-07-2020 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 10-09-2020

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy
Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एविं श्री जी. मिंजुनाथ लेखा दस्य के मक्ष । BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND SRI G MANJUNATHA, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3214/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3215/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner of Unit 301, to 305, 3 rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner of Income – Mumbai-400 098 tax, Range 16…

DCIT 7(3), Mumbai vs. Tata Sky Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the Asst

ITA 3971/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3214/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3215/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner Of Unit 301, To 305, 3 Rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [Now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner Of Income – Mumbai-400 098 Tax, Range 16(1)] Mumbai .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aagcs9294M Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3971/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3972/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S Tata Sky Ltd. Income Tax 7(3) 34D Floor, C-1, Wadia 6Th Room No. 615, Floor, International Centre, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Bombay Dyeing), Mumbai-400 020 Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbi-400 025 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Senior Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29-07-2020 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 10-09-2020

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy
Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एविं श्री जी. मिंजुनाथ लेखा दस्य के मक्ष । BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND SRI G MANJUNATHA, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3214/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3215/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner of Unit 301, to 305, 3 rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner of Income – Mumbai-400 098 tax, Range 16…

Tata Sky Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cir 7(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the Asst

ITA 3215/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3214/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3215/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner Of Unit 301, To 305, 3 Rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [Now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner Of Income – Mumbai-400 098 Tax, Range 16(1)] Mumbai .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aagcs9294M Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3971/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3972/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S Tata Sky Ltd. Income Tax 7(3) 34D Floor, C-1, Wadia 6Th Room No. 615, Floor, International Centre, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Bombay Dyeing), Mumbai-400 020 Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbi-400 025 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Senior Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29-07-2020 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 10-09-2020

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy
Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एविं श्री जी. मिंजुनाथ लेखा दस्य के मक्ष । BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND SRI G MANJUNATHA, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3214/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3215/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner of Unit 301, to 305, 3 rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner of Income – Mumbai-400 098 tax, Range 16…

Tata Sky Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cir 7(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the Asst

ITA 3214/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3214/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3215/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner Of Unit 301, To 305, 3 Rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [Now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner Of Income – Mumbai-400 098 Tax, Range 16(1)] Mumbai .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aagcs9294M Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3971/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 3972/Mum/2014 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2010-11) The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S Tata Sky Ltd. Income Tax 7(3) 34D Floor, C-1, Wadia 6Th Room No. 615, Floor, International Centre, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Bombay Dyeing), Mumbai-400 020 Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbi-400 025 (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Senior Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 29-07-2020 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 10-09-2020

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R Manjunatha Swamy
Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “E” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एविं श्री जी. मिंजुनाथ लेखा दस्य के मक्ष । BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND SRI G MANJUNATHA, AM Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3214/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2009-10) Aayakr ApIla saM./ ITA No. 3215/Mum/2014 (inaQa-arNa baYa- / Assessment Year 2010-11) Tata Sky Limited The Asst. Commissioner of Unit 301, to 305, 3 rd Floor, Income Tax, Circle 7(3), Windsor, Off C.S.T. Road, [now Assistant Vs. Kalina, Santacruz (East), Commissioner of Income – Mumbai-400 098 tax, Range 16…

Tata Motors Ltd, Mumbai vs. CIT (Ltu), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3925/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri G. Manjunathatata Motors Ltd. Vs. The Cit(Ltu) 29Th Floor, Centre 1 Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street World Trade Centre Hutatma Chowk Cuffe Parade Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 005 Pan/Gir No.Aaact2727Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 35DSection 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. The CIT(LTU) 29th Floor, Centre 1 Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street World Trade Centre Hutatma Chowk Cuffe Parade Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 005 PAN/GIR No.AAACT2727Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Revenue by Shri.R.Manjunatha Swamy, CIT, DR Assessee by Shri. Rajan Vora & Shri.Nikhil Tiwari, AR’s Date of Hearing 25/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement 13/12/2019 आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश PER G.MANJUNATHA: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed agains…

Idea Cellular Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO (TDS) 1(2)(4), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3785/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarita No. 3785/Mum/2016 For (Assessment Year 2012-13) M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Ito (Tds)-1(2)(4), (Formerly Known As Idea 803, K.G. Mittal Ayurvedic Cellular Ltd.), Skyline Icon, Vs. Hospital Building, 1St Floor, 86/92 Andheri Kurla Charni Road (W), Road, Marol Naka, Andheri Mumbai-400002. (E), Mumbai-400059. Pan: Aaacb2100P Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi with Shri C.D. Joshi (AR)For Respondent: Shri S. Padmaja CIT-DR with Shri V.K. Agarwal ( Sr DR)
Section 133ASection 191Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 254(1)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 3785/Mum/2016 for (Assessment Year 2012-13) M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. ITO (TDS)-1(2)(4), (Formerly known as Idea 803, K.G. Mittal Ayurvedic Cellular Ltd.), Skyline Icon, Vs. Hospital Building, 1st Floor, 86/92 Andheri Kurla Charni Road (W), Road, Marol Naka, Andheri Mumbai-400002. (E), Mumbai-400059. PAN: AAACB2100P Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Ronak Doshi with Shri C.D. Joshi (AR) Respondent by : Shri S. Padmaja CIT-DR with Shri V.K. Agarwal ( Sr DR) Date…

Tata Moters Limited (Formerly Known As Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Ltd.), Mumbai vs. Dy. CIT, Cir..-2(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3333/MUM/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Jul 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm M/S. Tata Motors Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of (Formerly Known As Tata Income Tax-2(1), Engineering & Locomotive Aayakar Bhavan Company Limited M.K. Marg, Mumbai – 400 Bombay House, 24 020 Homi Mody Street Hutatma Chowk Mumbai – 400 001 Pan/Gir No.Aaact2727Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Tata Motors Limited Income Tax-2(1), (Formerly Known As Tata Aayakar Bhavan Engineering & Locomotive M.K. Marg, Mumbai – Company Limited 400 020 Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street Hutatma Chowk Mumbai – 400 001 Pan/Gir No.Aaact2727Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM M/s. Tata Motors Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of (Formerly known as Tata Income Tax-2(1), Engineering & Locomotive Aayakar Bhavan Company Limited M.K. Marg, Mumbai – 400 Bombay House, 24 020 Homi Mody Street Hutatma Chowk Mumbai – 400 001 PAN/GIR No.AAACT2727Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Tata Motors Limited Income Tax-2(1), (Formerly known as Tata Aayakar Bhavan Engineering & Locomotive M.K. Marg, Mumbai – Company Limited 400 020 Bombay House, 24 Homi Mody Street Hutatma Chow…

Tata Chemicals Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT 2(3), Mumbai

ITA 2965/MUM/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Apr 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2002-03 Tata Chemicals Ltd. Deputy Commissioner Of Bombay House, Vs. Income Tax-2(3)(1), 5Th 24 Homi Mody Street, Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, Mumbai-400001 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan No. Aaact4059M Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2002-03 Deputy Commissioner Tata Chemicals Ltd. Of Income Tax-2(3)(1), Vs. Bombay House, 5Th Floor, Aayakar 24 Homi Mody Street, Bhavan, M.K. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Aaact4059M Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Nitesh Joshi, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Choudhary Arun Kumar Singh, Date Of Hearing : 25/01/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 22/04/2019

For Appellant: Mr. Nitesh Joshi, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Choudhary Arun Kumar Singh
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2002-03 Tata Chemicals Ltd. Deputy Commissioner of Bombay House, Vs. Income Tax-2(3)(1), 5th 24 Homi Mody Street, Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, Mumbai-400001 M.K. Road, Mumbai- 400020 PAN No. AAACT4059M Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2002-03 Deputy Commissioner Tata Chemicals Ltd. of Income Tax-2(3)(1), Vs. Bombay House, 5th Floor, Aayakar 24 Homi Mody Street, Bhavan, M.K. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 Mumbai-400020 PAN No. AAACT4059M Appellant Resp…

Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. K.J. Infrastructure Projects India Pvt. Ltd., Pune

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 605/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: N O N EFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal
Section 80ISection 80l

…ppeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The First Appellate Authority allowed the claim of assessee by following the decision of Pune Bench of Tribunal in the case of Advik Hi Tech (P.) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax reported as 67 SOT 158. Against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Dr. Vivek Aggarwal representing the Department vehemently supported the findings of Assessing Officer in respect of disallowance of deduction u/s. 80IA(5) of the Act. The ld. DR prayed for setting aside the findings of Commissioner of Incom…