(i) CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

378 ITR 443High Court2015#90 most cited

What is (i) CIT v. Merchem Ltd. authority for?

Belated remittance of employees' contribution to ESI and PF, even if deposited before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1), is not allowed as a deduction. This disallowance falls under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x), as Section 43B applies only to employer's contributions.

631

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 372,272 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Merchem Ltd. · 378 ITR 443 · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 2(24)(x) · employees' contribution ESI PF · belated remittance · disallowance of deduction · Section 139(1) · Section 43B · Checkmate Services

Sections most often in play

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)

Issues it is cited on

section 43b(b)clarificatory amendmentretrospective amendmentsection 2(24)(x)section 36(1)(va)section 43bsection 2(24)section 36(1)section 43section 36section 139(1)section 139

Judgments citing (i) CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

Mayajaal Entertainment Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 372/CHNY/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Shivam Davey, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar,JCIT
Section 113Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

…. The CIT(A) has noted the case laws in favour of Revenue: 1. Popular Vehicles & Services (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT [2018] 96 taxmann.com 13 (Kerala), 2. CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation [2014] 41 taxmann.com 100 (Gujarat) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd. [2015] 378 ITR 443 (Kerala). 7 The CIT(A) himself noted the ambiguity in para 7.4 of his order, which reads as under: 7.4 While rendering above decisions the Hon’ble High Courts had the occasion to examine and distinguish a catena of judgements which are usually relied upon by appellants to advance the proposition that the provisions of section 43B encompass with…

M.W.S. & Co., Bhadohi vs. Dy. C.I.T., Range - 1, Varanasi

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 25/VNS/2021[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

…dras High Court in the case of Industrial Security and Intelligence Private Limited (supra). The Revenue brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Madras High Court , decision(s) of Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT v. Merchem Limited reported in (2015) 378 ITR 443(Ker.) and also decision in the case of Popular Vehicles and Services Private Limited v. CIT reported in M.W.S. & Co. (2018) 96 taxmann.com 13(Ker.), wherein this issue is decided by Hon'ble Kerala High Court in favour of Revenue and with this background, Hon'ble Madras High Court remanded the matter back to the file of learned CIT(A) for fresh a…

M.W.S. & Co., Bhadohi vs. Dy. C.I.T., Range - 1, Varanasi

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 24/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

…dras High Court in the case of Industrial Security and Intelligence Private Limited (supra). The Revenue brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Madras High Court , decision(s) of Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of CIT v. Merchem Limited reported in (2015) 378 ITR 443(Ker.) and also decision in the case of Popular Vehicles and Services Private Limited v. CIT reported in M.W.S. & Co. (2018) 96 taxmann.com 13(Ker.), wherein this issue is decided by Hon'ble Kerala High Court in favour of Revenue and with this background, Hon'ble Madras High Court remanded the matter back to the file of learned CIT(A) for fresh a…

M/S Hotel Gaudavan Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.1, Hotel Complex, Jodhpur Barmer Link Road, Jaisalmer vs. CPC, Bengaluru/ ACIT/DCIT, Circle-6, Jaipur

In the result, all these appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 84/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra ( Addl. CIT) a
Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…to be applicable only with prospective effect from 1.4.2021, I hold that the impugned disallowance is not sustainable in view of all these latest developments even if the Revenue’s case is supported by the following case law. (i) CIT vs. Merchem Ltd, [2015] 378 ITR 443(Ker) (ii) CIT vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (2014) 366 ITR 170 (Guj.) (iii) CIT vs. South India Corporation Ltd. (2000) 242 ITR 114 (Ker) (iv) CIT vs. GTN Textiles Ltd. (2004) 269 ITR 282 (Ker) (v) CIT vs. Jairam & Sons [2004] 269 ITR 285 (Ker) The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is directed to be deleted therefore.” 10. On an identi…

M/S Hotel Gaudavan Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.1, Hotel Complex, Jodhpur Barmer Link Road, Jaisalmer vs. CPC, Bengaluru/ ACIT/DCIT, Circle-6, Jaipur

In the result, all these appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 83/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Apr 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra ( Addl. CIT) a
Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…to be applicable only with prospective effect from 1.4.2021, I hold that the impugned disallowance is not sustainable in view of all these latest developments even if the Revenue’s case is supported by the following case law. (i) CIT vs. Merchem Ltd, [2015] 378 ITR 443(Ker) (ii) CIT vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (2014) 366 ITR 170 (Guj.) (iii) CIT vs. South India Corporation Ltd. (2000) 242 ITR 114 (Ker) (iv) CIT vs. GTN Textiles Ltd. (2004) 269 ITR 282 (Ker) (v) CIT vs. Jairam & Sons [2004] 269 ITR 285 (Ker) The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is directed to be deleted therefore.” 10. On an identi…

Neeraj Purohit, Jaipur vs. CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal of the assessees is allowed

ITA 81/JPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Apr 2022AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.CIT) a
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…er, be applicable only with prospective effect from 1.4.2021, I hold that the impugned disallowance is not sustainable in view of all these latest developments even if the Revenue’s case is supported by the following case law. (i) CIT vs. Merchem Ltd, [2015] 378 ITR 443(Ker) (ii) CIT vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (2014) 366 ITR 170 (Guj.) (iii) CIT vs. South India Corporation Ltd. (2000) 242 ITR 114 (Ker) (iv) CIT vs. GTN Textiles Ltd. (2004) 269 ITR 282 (Ker) (v) CIT vs. Jairam & Sons [2004] 269 ITR 285 (Ker) The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is directed to be deleted therefore.” 10. On an identi…

C R Textile Mills, Athanoor vs. Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Coimbatore

Appeal is allowed

ITA 54/CHNY/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ’सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.54/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) C R Textile Mills, Pr. CIT-1, बनाम/ 204, 2B, Attayampatti Road, Coimbatore. Vs. Athanoor Post – 636 301. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACFJ-9421-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) – Ld. AR ""थ"कीओरसे/Respon…

Gokul Industries, Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 412/CHNY/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ’सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.412 & 577/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Gokul Industries DCIT 7-A, Kamatchiamman Street, बनाम/ Non Corporate Circle – 10(1), Sathyamoorthy Nagar, Ekkaduthangal, Chennai. Vs. Chennai – 600 032. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAAFG-2132-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by :…

Vanitha Textiles, Palladam vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 407/CHNY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ’सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.407/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) M/s. Vanitha Textiles, DCIT बनाम/ 182, Chettipalayam Road, CPC, Bangalore. Vs. Palladam. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABFV-6079-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (CA) – Ld. AR ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri Saj…

Gokul Industries, Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 577/CHNY/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ’सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.412 & 577/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Gokul Industries DCIT 7-A, Kamatchiamman Street, बनाम/ Non Corporate Circle – 10(1), Sathyamoorthy Nagar, Ekkaduthangal, Chennai. Vs. Chennai – 600 032. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAAFG-2132-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by :…

M/S Cauvery Stones, Chennai vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 124/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri D. Palanivel (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA Nos. 123 & 124/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) M/s. Cauvery Stones Impex Pvt. Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ 8, 2nd Street, Ganapathy Colony Centralized Processing Center Vs. Chennai – 600 083. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCC-3310-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ App…

M/S Cauvery Stones Impex Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 123/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri D. Palanivel (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA Nos. 123 & 124/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) M/s. Cauvery Stones Impex Pvt. Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ 8, 2nd Street, Ganapathy Colony Centralized Processing Center Vs. Chennai – 600 083. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCC-3310-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ App…

Amazinf Export Corporation, Palladam vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 99/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

M/S. Ultracon Structural System Private Limited, Chennai vs. Income Tax Officer Corporate Circle - 3(2), Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 97/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Mudhra Fine Blanc Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 96/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Mookambika Infosolutions Pvt Ltd, Madurai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 95/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Balakrishnan (Director) & ShriFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA Nos.94 & 95/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Mookambika Infosolutions Pvt Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ 31, IIIrd Floor, Town Hall Road, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Madurai – 625 001. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAOCS-3451-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appella…

Sri Mookambika Infosolutions Pvt Ltd, Madurai, Tamil Nadu vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 94/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Balakrishnan (Director) & ShriFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA Nos.94 & 95/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Mookambika Infosolutions Pvt Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ 31, IIIrd Floor, Town Hall Road, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Madurai – 625 001. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAOCS-3451-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appella…

M/S Tsugami Precision Engineering India P Ltd., Kancheepuram vs. DCIT, Corporate Circle-3(1), Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 89/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

M/S Tsugami Precision Engineering India P Ltd., Kancheepuram vs. DCIT, Corporate Circle-3(1), Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 88/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Wheels India Ltd, Chennai vs. ACIT, Large Tax Payer Unit-1, Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 8/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…