Hiralal Maganlal & Co. v. DCIT

96 ITD 113Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2005#2593 most cited

What is Hiralal Maganlal & Co. v. DCIT authority for?

A voluntary statement made under Section 132(4) during search proceedings, admitting undisclosed income based on seized material and not retracted promptly, is generally binding. Subsequent retraction without satisfactory explanation is considered an afterthought and may not be accepted.

45

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Hiralal Maganlal & Co. v. DCIT · Section 132(4) · Section 131 · Section 132 · search and seizure · statement during search · voluntary admission · undisclosed income · retraction of statement · CBDT circular · block assessment · seized documents

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hiralal Maganlal & Co. v. DCIT