Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-3(1)(2), Bangalore

125 Taxmann.com 80High Court2021#7228 most cited

What is Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-3(1)(2), Bangalore authority for?

The Assessing Officer must record satisfaction regarding the inadequacy of the assessee's claim before invoking Section 14A read with Rule 8D for disallowance of expenditure related to exempt income.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. ACIT · section 14A · rule 8D · satisfaction of Assessing Officer · disallowance of expenditure · exempt income · Karnataka High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-3(1)(2), Bangalore

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-3(1)(2), Bangalore (125 Taxmann.com 80) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax