Hiaben Jayantilal Shah v. ITO

310 ITR 31High Court2009#1717 most cited

What is Hiaben Jayantilal Shah v. ITO authority for?

When an assessee presents a registered valuer's report for an asset, the Assessing Officer, if forming an opinion that the value claimed is less than the fair market value, must refer the valuation to the Valuation Officer under Section 55A(a). The AO cannot unilaterally reject the registered valuer's report or resort to Section 55A(b) in such a scenario.

66

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Hiaben Jayantilal Shah v. ITO · Section 55A · registered valuer report · Assessing Officer · Valuation Officer reference · fair market value · Section 55A(a) · Section 55A(b) · DVO reference · property valuation

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hiaben Jayantilal Shah v. ITO

Kum.Kulsum Abdulrazak Bangadiwala, Baroda vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3), Baroda

In the result, we see no reason to interfere

ITA 2036/AHD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-आयकर अपील सं./ Ita.No.1802/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Mohmmad Afaque Abdulrazak Ito, Ward-5(1) Bangdiwala Baroda. Vs J.M. Villa, Killedar Kancha B/H. Mes Girls School Gendigate Baroda 390 001 Pan : Avvpb 8654 P आयकर अपील सं./ Ita.No.2036/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Kum. Kulsum Abdulrazak Ito, Ward-5(3) Baroda. Bangdiwala Vs J.M. Villa, Killedar Kancha B/H. Mes Girls School Gendigate Baroda 390 001 Pan : Aylpb 8030 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Smt. Kinjal Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Dilip Kumar, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 06/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07/02/2020 आदेश/O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt. Kinjal Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dilip Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 50CSection 54F

…e governed by clause (a) of section 55A of the Act and the Assessing Officer could not have resorted to clause (b) thereof as held by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Hiraben Jayantilal Shah vs. Income-tax Officer and another reported in [2009] 310 ITR 31(Guj).In the said decision, it was held and observed as under:- “10. Under clause(a) of sec. 55A of the Act under the Assessing Officer is entitled to make the reference to the Valuation Officer in a case where the value of the asset as claimed by the assessee is in accordance with the estimate made by the Registered Valuer, if the Assessing Offic…

Mohmmad Afaque Abdulrazak Bangdiwala, Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(1), Baroda

In the result, we see no reason to interfere

ITA 1802/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-आयकर अपील सं./ Ita.No.1802/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Mohmmad Afaque Abdulrazak Ito, Ward-5(1) Bangdiwala Baroda. Vs J.M. Villa, Killedar Kancha B/H. Mes Girls School Gendigate Baroda 390 001 Pan : Avvpb 8654 P आयकर अपील सं./ Ita.No.2036/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Kum. Kulsum Abdulrazak Ito, Ward-5(3) Baroda. Bangdiwala Vs J.M. Villa, Killedar Kancha B/H. Mes Girls School Gendigate Baroda 390 001 Pan : Aylpb 8030 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Smt. Kinjal Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Dilip Kumar, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 06/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07/02/2020 आदेश/O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt. Kinjal Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dilip Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 50CSection 54F

…e governed by clause (a) of section 55A of the Act and the Assessing Officer could not have resorted to clause (b) thereof as held by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Hiraben Jayantilal Shah vs. Income-tax Officer and another reported in [2009] 310 ITR 31(Guj).In the said decision, it was held and observed as under:- “10. Under clause(a) of sec. 55A of the Act under the Assessing Officer is entitled to make the reference to the Valuation Officer in a case where the value of the asset as claimed by the assessee is in accordance with the estimate made by the Registered Valuer, if the Assessing Offic…

Smt. Dhirajben Pravinbhai Patel, Nadiad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Nadiad

In the result, both appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 902/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.902/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Smt. Dhirajben Pravinbhai Patel Vs. Ito, Ward-3 Ramipoura, Dakor Nadiad. Dist. Kheda Nadiad 388 225 Pan : Bgwpp 6338 R "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Shardaben Chimanlal Patel Vs. Ito, Ward-1(2)(5) Kal Bhairav Mandir Baroda. Sevasi Vadodara. Pan : Bobpp 2349 F

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Sr.DR
Section 55A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘B’ BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.902/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Smt. Dhirajben Pravinbhai Patel Vs. ITO, Ward-3 Ramipoura, Dakor Nadiad. Dist. Kheda Nadiad 388 225 PAN : BGWPP 6338 R "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Shardaben Chimanlal Patel Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2)(5) Kal Bhairav Mandir Baroda. Sevasi Vadodara. PAN : BOBPP 2349 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sunil Talati, AR Revenue by : S…

Shardaben Chimanlal Patel, Vadodara vs. ITO, Ward-1(2) (5), Vadodara

In the result, both appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1754/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.902/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Smt. Dhirajben Pravinbhai Patel Vs. Ito, Ward-3 Ramipoura, Dakor Nadiad. Dist. Kheda Nadiad 388 225 Pan : Bgwpp 6338 R "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Shardaben Chimanlal Patel Vs. Ito, Ward-1(2)(5) Kal Bhairav Mandir Baroda. Sevasi Vadodara. Pan : Bobpp 2349 F

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Sr.DR
Section 55A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘B’ BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.902/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Smt. Dhirajben Pravinbhai Patel Vs. ITO, Ward-3 Ramipoura, Dakor Nadiad. Dist. Kheda Nadiad 388 225 PAN : BGWPP 6338 R "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Shardaben Chimanlal Patel Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2)(5) Kal Bhairav Mandir Baroda. Sevasi Vadodara. PAN : BOBPP 2349 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sunil Talati, AR Revenue by : S…

Shri Ambalal Somabhai (Kumbhar) Prajapati, Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1)(2), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 315/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 315/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Ambalal Somabhai (Kumbhar) Prajapati Ito, Ward-7(1)(2) 1, Devi Annapurna Society Vs Ahmedabad. Nr. Gurudwara, B/H. West & Park Thaltej, Bodakdev Ahmedabad 380058. Pan : Abgpk 5078 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.F. Jain, Ar Revenue By : Shri S.K. Dev, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri P.F. Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Dev, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 154Section 2(14)(iii)Section 55A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘A’ BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 315/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Ambalal Somabhai (Kumbhar) Prajapati ITO, Ward-7(1)(2) 1, Devi Annapurna Society Vs Ahmedabad. Nr. Gurudwara, B/h. West & Park Thaltej, Bodakdev Ahmedabad 380058. PAN : ABGPK 5078 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri P.F. Jain, AR Revenue by : Shri S.K. Dev, Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 09/08/2018 घोषणा क" त…

ITO, WD-3(3), Kolkata vs. M/S Pioneer Iron & Steel Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Howrah

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 203/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jun 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.203/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Ito, Ward-3(3), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Pioneer Iron & Steel Corporation (P) Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, P-7, 4Th Floor, 6, Tarachand Ganguly Street, Howrah – Chowringhee Sq., Kolkata – 700 069. 711202. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aabcp 6093 L (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A. K. Tiwari, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri R. K. Patodi, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)(v)Section 55A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D”, BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.203/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) ITO, Ward-3(3), Kolkata Vs. M/s. Pioneer Iron & Steel Corporation (P) Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, P-7, 4th Floor, 6, Tarachand Ganguly Street, Howrah – Chowringhee Sq., Kolkata – 700 069. 711202. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. :AABCP 6093 L (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri A. K. Tiwari, CIT(DR) Respondent by :Shri R. K. Patodi, FCA सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 25/04/2018 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 13/06/…