Hari Mohan Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-63(1), New Delhi

110 Taxmann.com 119High Court2019#3849 most cited

What is Hari Mohan Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-63(1), New Delhi authority for?

The powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) to enhance an assessment are limited to the assessment reached through a particular process and cannot be extended to include income that ought to have been computed under different, prescribed procedures for escaped income from new sources.

30

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Hari Mohan Sharma · Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax · Section 143(3) · Section 153A · Section 263 · enhancement of assessment · powers of CIT(A) · escaped income · new sources of income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Hari Mohan Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-63(1), New Delhi

Goel Exim India Private Ltd., Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle-28, Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 563/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2016-17 Goel Exim India Private Acit Limited Central Circle-28 4Th Shop No.403, Floor, Vs. Delhi 2633-2634, 4Th Floor, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 Pan No.Aaacg1799B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Anup Mehta, Ca Respondent By Sh. Sh. Vivek Upadhyay, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 02/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 02/11/2023 Order Per N. K. Billaiya, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Preferred Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-29, New Delhi Dated 19.08.2021 Pertaining To A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The Sum & Substance Of The Grievance Of The Assessee Is That The Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Levy Of Penalty U/S. 271 (1) (C) Of The Act.

Section 143(3)Section 271

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Goel Exim India Private ACIT Limited Central Circle-28 4th Shop No.403, Floor, Vs. Delhi 2633-2634, 4th Floor, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 PAN No.AAACG1799B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Anup Mehta, CA Respondent by Sh. Sh. Vivek Upadhyay, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 02/11/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 02/11/2023 ORDER PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM: This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-29, N…

M/S. Angelica Properties Private Ltd., Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner Income-Tax

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1738/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble Jm & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Hon’Ble Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No: 403/Pun/2015 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Vason Engineers Ltd., Theadditional Commissioner Of (Formerly Angelica Properties Pvt. Vs Income Tax, Range1, Pune. Ltd.,) 301, Phoenix, Opp.Residency Club, Bund Garden Road, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aafca 8644 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No: 1738/Pun/2016 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Angelica Properties Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Opp. Grand Hyatt Hotel, Vs Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vimannagar, Puune – 411 014. Pan: Aafca 8644 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Dharmesh Shah – Ar Revenue By Shri Naveen Gupta – Dr Date Of Hearing 24/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Pune Dated 30.01.2015 & 09.06.2016 For The Assessment Years 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Assessee In Ita No.403/Pun/2015 For The A.Y.2010-11 Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & In Facts Enhancing The Income From Sale Of ‘Matrix It Building’ By Changing The Head Of Income From Capital Gains To Business Income Without Complying With The Principles Of Natural Justice & Without Giving Any Opportunity Of Hearing.

Section 14A

…n the similar manner, reliance is also placed on the following decisions: a. CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry [44 ITR 891 (SC)] [Page 748-753 of PB No. 4] b. CIT v. B. P. Sherafudin [399 ITR 524 (Ker.)] [Page 754-769 of PB No. 4] c. Hari Mohan Sharma v. ACIT [110 Taxmann.com 119 (Del.)] [Page 578- 594 of PB No. 3] d. CIT v. Rai Bahadur Hardutroy Motilal Chamaria [66 ITR 443 (SC)][Page 634-643 of PB No. 3] e. ITO v. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd. [88 ITR(T) 616] [Page 644-662 of PB No.3] 7.4. Without prejudice, it is submitted that even if the enhancement carried out by the Ld. CIT(A) is held to be within his powers, the…

Vascon Engineers Ltd (Successor to Angelica Properties Pvt. Ltd.), Pune vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax, Pune

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 403/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble Jm & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Hon’Ble Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No: 403/Pun/2015 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Vason Engineers Ltd., Theadditional Commissioner Of (Formerly Angelica Properties Pvt. Vs Income Tax, Range1, Pune. Ltd.,) 301, Phoenix, Opp.Residency Club, Bund Garden Road, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aafca 8644 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No: 1738/Pun/2016 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Angelica Properties Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Opp. Grand Hyatt Hotel, Vs Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vimannagar, Puune – 411 014. Pan: Aafca 8644 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Dharmesh Shah – Ar Revenue By Shri Naveen Gupta – Dr Date Of Hearing 24/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Pune Dated 30.01.2015 & 09.06.2016 For The Assessment Years 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Assessee In Ita No.403/Pun/2015 For The A.Y.2010-11 Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & In Facts Enhancing The Income From Sale Of ‘Matrix It Building’ By Changing The Head Of Income From Capital Gains To Business Income Without Complying With The Principles Of Natural Justice & Without Giving Any Opportunity Of Hearing.

Section 14A

…n the similar manner, reliance is also placed on the following decisions: a. CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry [44 ITR 891 (SC)] [Page 748-753 of PB No. 4] b. CIT v. B. P. Sherafudin [399 ITR 524 (Ker.)] [Page 754-769 of PB No. 4] c. Hari Mohan Sharma v. ACIT [110 Taxmann.com 119 (Del.)] [Page 578- 594 of PB No. 3] d. CIT v. Rai Bahadur Hardutroy Motilal Chamaria [66 ITR 443 (SC)][Page 634-643 of PB No. 3] e. ITO v. Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd. [88 ITR(T) 616] [Page 644-662 of PB No.3] 7.4. Without prejudice, it is submitted that even if the enhancement carried out by the Ld. CIT(A) is held to be within his powers, the…