Bhavya Construction Co., Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cir 21(1), Mumbai
The appeals of the assessee are dismissed
ITA 4389/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai09 Dec 2016AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan
Section 143(3)Section 80I
…989 SC 611, p. 614 : (1989) 1 SCC 44; Mathuram Agrawal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, JT 1999 (8) SC 505, pp. 511, 512 : AIR 2000 SC 109, p. 113 : (1999) 8 SCC 667. See further Hansraj & Sons v. State of Jammu & Kashmir, AIR 2002 SC 2692, pp. 2698, 2699 : (2002) 6 SCC 227; Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. ACER India Ltd., (2004) 8 SCC 173, p. 184: (2004) 8 JT 53.) In refuting the doctrine of 'the substance of the matter' LORD TOMLIN observed: “"It is said that in revenue cases there is a doctrine that the court may ignore the legal position and regard what is called 'the substance of the matter'. This…