Gyankumar Agarwal (Ind.) v. Assistant Commissioner Income-tax
30 Taxmann.com 114Reported decision2013#2505 most cited
What is Gyankumar Agarwal (Ind.) v. Assistant Commissioner Income-tax authority for?
The burden of proof lies on the assessee to rebut the contents of documents or incriminating material discovered during a search and seizure operation, especially concerning undisclosed income, leveraging presumptions under sections like 132(4A) and 292C.
46
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Gyankumar Agarwal · 30 Taxmann.com 114 · section 132(4A) · section 292C · burden of proof assessee · documents found during search · rebuttal incriminating material · presumption search evidence · undisclosed income proof · section 132(4)