Gurinder Singh Bawa v. DCIT

28 Taxmann.com 328Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#1142 most cited
99

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Gurinder Singh Bawa v. DCIT · section 132(4) statement · retracted statement · search and seizure assessment · section 153A · panchnama · evidentiary value · unexplained income · section 69B · 28 Taxmann.com 328

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Gurinder Singh Bawa v. DCIT

DCIT, CC-5(4), Mumbai vs. Shri Rajenderkumar Miglani, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 2925/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm & S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2925/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Dcit, Central Circle-5(4) बिधम/ Rajindrakumar Miglani Room No.1927, 19Th Floor, Uttam House, 69, P „Dmello Vs. Air India Building, Nariman Road, Carnac Bunder, Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400009. & Cross Objection No.20/Mum/2021 आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2925/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Rajindrakumar Miglani बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-5(4) Room No.1927, 19Th Floor, Uttam House, 69, P „Dmello Vs. Road, Carnac Bunder, Air India Building, Nariman Mumbai-400009. Point, Mumbai-400021. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpm7288D (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Sanjeev Kashyp (Dr) Assessee By: Shri K Shivaram & Rahul Hakani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 30/03/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/04/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue As Well As Assessee Have Filed The Above Mentioned Appeal As Well As Cross-Objection Against The Order Dated 25.02.2019 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2010-11. C.O. No.20/Mum2021 A.Y.2010-11

For Appellant: Shri K Shivaram & Rahul HakaniFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyp (DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…ned finality. The AO loses jurisdiction to verify the return of income. Since no assessment would be pending there would be no abatement of any proceedings. The appellant also relied on the subsequent decision of the Mumbai ITAT in Gurinder Singh Bawa vs DCYP 150 ITD 40. It was contended that in this decision the Hon'ble ITAT has held that where the assessment is completed under summary scheme u/s 143(1) and time limit for issue of notice u/s 143(2) has expired on the date of search. There was no question of abatement of assessment proceeding and, therefore, addition could be made only on the basis of incriminati…

Pooja Gandhi, Navi Mumbai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-45, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby ordered to be allowed

ITA 2037/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2037/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Smt. Pooja Gandhi बिधम/ Acit, Central Circle-45 A/303, Balaji Gardens, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- Vs. Sector-11, Koparkhairne, 400020. New Mumbai-400709. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpa1069Q (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee By: Shri Gaurav Kabra Revenue By: Shri V. Sreekar (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 13/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 25.01.2018 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2009- 10. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: -

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav KabraFor Respondent: Shri V. Sreekar (DR)
Section 132Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 153Section 153A

…ion that arises is as to when and how an assessment should be considered as pending as on the date of initiation of search. In this regard, I may refer to the decision rendered by the Mumbai bench of Tribunal in the case of Gurinder Singh Bawa Vs. DCIT (2014)(150 ITD 40), wherein the Tribunal has observed that after the expiry of time limit prescribed for issuing notice u/s 143(2) of the Act, the assessment cannot be considered to be pending if no notice under that section was issued. Under the scheme of the Act, after filing of return of income, the assessing officer can assume jurisdiction to assess the income…