Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT

114 ITD 189Income Tax Appellate Tribunal#22166 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2022.

Judgments citing Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT

PROCTER & GAMBLE HYGIENE AND HEALTH CARE LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT CIR 8, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by assessee stands allowed

ITA 4903/MUM/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 May 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri M. Balaganeshआअसं. 4903/मुं/2011 ("न.व. 2004-05) Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Health Care Ltd. P&G Plaza, Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakala, Andheri (East), Mumbai – 400 099 Pan: Aaacp-6332-M ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cir.8, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai 400 020 . ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Yogesh Thar ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Ms.Vatsalya Saxena & Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 09/05/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh TharFor Respondent: Ms.Vatsalya Saxena and Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80I

…is contentions placed reliance on the following decisions: (i) Ramco Cements Ltd. vs. JCIT in TC(A) No.570 of 2004 by Hon’ble Madras High Court. (ii) Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. vs. CIT, 350 ITR 94 (Guj) (iii) JCIT vs. Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. , 114 ITD 189 (Mum) 5. Per contra, Ms. Vatsalya Saxena representing the Department vehemently supported the impugned order .The ld. Departmental Representative submitted that 6 a field enquiry was made by the Department. During the course of enquiry Asstt. Director of Income Tax (Investigation) visited the Plant and the statements of various persons were reco…

Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT (114 ITD 189) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax