Google India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

172 Taxmann.com 378High Court2025#16985 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Google India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Kuldip Singh, Ranchi vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-1, Ranchi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/RAN/2025[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.180/Ran/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kuldip Singh…………………….……….……...................……….……Appellant The Avenue Vishnupuri Marg, Upper Burdwan Compound, Lalpur, Ranchi- 834001. [Pan: Agjps6921P] Vs. Dcit/Acit, Circle-1, Ranchi…...…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Kailash Gautam, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 05, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 10, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 06.03.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH-RANCHI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member and Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.180/Ran/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kuldip Singh…………………….……….……...................……….……Appellant The Avenue Vishnupuri Marg, Upper Burdwan Compound, Lalpur, Ranchi- 834001. [PAN: AGJPS6921P] vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-1, Ranchi…...…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Kailash Gautam, DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the h…

Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.(Formerly Known As Vodafone Digilink Ltd Which Merged With Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd.), New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-26(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4189/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 May 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vodafone Mobile Services Limited Deputy Commissioner Of (Formerly Known As Vodafone Income Tax, Circle 26(2), Digilink Ltd Which Stands Vs. New Delhi Amalgamated With Vodafone Mobile (Jurisdiction Realigned From Service Limited) Circle 17(1), New Delhi) C-48, Phase-Ii, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi- 110020. Pan No. Aaaca 3202 D Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Ketan VedFor Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 194HSection 37(1)Section 40Section 43(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “J” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Vodafone Mobile Services Limited Deputy Commissioner of (formerly known as Vodafone Income Tax, Circle 26(2), Digilink Ltd which stands Vs. New Delhi amalgamated with Vodafone Mobile (Jurisdiction realigned from Service Limited) Circle 17(1), New Delhi) C-48, Phase-II, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi- 110020. PAN NO. AAACA 3202 D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Mr. Ketan Ved Mr. Akshay Nagrajan Revenue by : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Sr. DR…

Google India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (172 Taxmann.com 378) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax