How many judgments cite Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT?

11 judgments on BharatTax cite Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (117 Taxmann.com 39), spanning 2022 to 2024.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 10AA, Section 143(3), Section 144C(13), Section 234A, Section 234B, Section 271(1)(c).

Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

117 Taxmann.com 39Reported decision2020#9972 most cited

What is Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT authority for?

A company undergoing restructuring activity during the relevant financial year may be rejected as a comparable in transfer pricing analysis, as such events can impact its profitability.

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT · 117 taxmann.com 39 · comparable company · restructuring activity · transfer pricing · T.P. adjustment · related party transaction · transactional net margin method · tested party · section 92b(1) · captive service provider

Sections most often in play

Section 10AA Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234A Section 234B Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B Section 56(2)

Issues it is cited on

section 92b(1)captive service provider interest on outstanding receivables working capital adjustment slump sale related party transaction demerger transactional net margin method specified domestic transaction tested party section 92b comparable companies

Judgments citing Global Logic India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

Concentrix Daksh Services India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. ACIT, Circle-4(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 485/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Dey, Vice-Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Ankul Goyal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR)

Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Vice-President Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 485/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year: 2016-17 Concentrix Daksh Services India P. Ltd., Vs ACIT, DLF IT SEZ, Building No. 14, Tower-D, Circle-4(2), 17th Floor, DLF Cyber City, Sector 24 & New Delhi-110002 25A, DLF Phase-III, Gurgaon, Haryana-122002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AABCD4187D Assessee by : Sh. Ankul Goyal, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing: 06.12.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 05.03.2024 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: T…

Emc Software and Services India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range- 2, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes as per the terms mentioned above

ITA 191/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT (D.R)

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.191/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s EMC Software and Services India Pvt. The Asst. Commissioner of Ltd., Income-tax, Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd., Special Range-2, SEZ – Marathahalli Ring Road, Bangalore. Vs. Doddanekundi Village Road, Bangalore-560 037. PAN: AABCT 0199 B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT (D.R) Date of Hearing : 03.01.2023 Date of Pronouncement…

M/S. Continental Automotive Components India Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 280/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.280/Bang/2021 Assessment year : 2016-17 M/s. Continental Automotive Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Components India Pvt. Ltd., of Income Tax, Plot No.53B, Circle 2(1)(1), Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. Hosur Road, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru – 560 099. PAN: AAKCS 9578C ASSESSEE RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Respondent by : Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 12.01.2023 Date of Pronoun…

Uxc India It Services Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 236/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU “A” BENCH, BENGALURU BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 236/Bang/2021 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/s. UXC India IT Services Pvt. Ltd. Digital Park, HP Avenue Vs. DCIT, Circle - 2(1)(1) 39/40, Electronic City Bengaluru Hosur Main Road Bangalore 560100 PAN – AABCU6681K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate Revenue by: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR Date of hearing: 02.11.2022 Date of pronouncement: 20.01.2023 O R D E R PER BEENA PILLAI, J.M. Present appeal is filed by the assessee a…

Applied Materials India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 209/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 209/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Applied Materials India Pvt. Ltd., Unit -5, 3Rd Floor, The Deputy Explorer Building, Commissioner Of International Tech Income Tax, Park, Circle – 1(1)(1), Whitefield Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 001. Pan: Aaeca2635C Appellant Respondent : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue By Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 30-11-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-11-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 31/03/2021 Passed By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi For A.Y. 2016-17 On Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Respondent: Shri T. Suryanarayana

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 195Section 40Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 209/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Applied Materials India Pvt. Ltd., Unit -5, 3rd Floor, The Deputy Explorer Building, Commissioner of International Tech Income Tax, Park, Circle – 1(1)(1), Whitefield Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 001. PAN: AAECA2635C APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Assessee by Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue by CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 30-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30-11-2022 ORDER PER BEENA…

Arm Embedded Technologies Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 1(1)(1), Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 235/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

For Appellant: 2.1 Rejecting the value of international transaction of provision of SWD and proFor Respondent: Shri T. Suryanarayana

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 235/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Arm Embedded Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bagmane World Technology Center, The Deputy SEZ Citrine Block, Commissioner of 5th Floor, Marathahalli Income Tax, Outer Ring Road, Circle 1 (1)(1), Doddanekkundi Village, Vs. Bengaluru. Mahadevapura, Bengaluru – 560 048. PAN: AAECA1582E APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Assessee by Advocate Revenue by : Shri Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 27-07-2022 Date…

Citrix R & D India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed partly as indicated herein above

ITA 220/BANG/2021[2016-17`]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Aug 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 220/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Citrix R&D India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Prestige Dynasty, Commissioner Of Ground Floor, Income Tax, 33/2, Ulsoor Road, Circle – 2(1)(1), Bangalore – 560042. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aabcn3639C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sumit Khurana, Ca Revenue By : Shri M. Mathivanan, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04-07-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25-08-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Assessment Order Dated 30/03/2021 Passed By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2016-17 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Grounds Mentioned Herein By The Appellant Are Without Prejudice To One Another. 1. That The Order Passed By The Learned Ao To The Extent Prejudicial To The Appellant, Is Bad In Law & Liable To Be Quashed. Transfer Pricing - 2. That The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(1)(1), Bangalore ("Assessing Officer" Or "Learned Ao") & The Dispute Resolution Panel - 1 ("Learned Panel" Or "Learned Drp")

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Khurana, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. Mathivanan, CIT-DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 220/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Citrix R&D India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Prestige Dynasty, Commissioner of Ground Floor, Income Tax, 33/2, Ulsoor Road, Circle – 2(1)(1), Bangalore – 560042. Vs. Bangalore. PAN: AABCN3639C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Sumit Khurana, CA Revenue by : Shri M. Mathivanan, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 04-07-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25-08-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assesse…

M/S. Airbus Group India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 1(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2385/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Sumeet Khurana, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, D.R

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92D

…IT(TP)A No.2385/Bang/2019 M/s. Airbus Group India Private Limited, Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.2385/Bang/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Airbus Group India Pvt. Ltd. 4th Floor, Xylem, Plot No.4&4A Dyavasandra Industrial Area Deputy Commissioner of Mahadevpura Post Income-tax Vs. Whitefield Road Circle – 1(1)(1) Bangalore 560 048. Bangalore PAN NO : AAGCA1513R APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Sumeet Khurana, A.R. Respondent by : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, D.R. Dat…

Mindteck (India) Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 252/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sit(Tp)A No.252/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Mindteck India Ltd., Vs. Dcit, A.M.R. Tech Park, Block 1, 3Rd Floor, Circle – 4(1)(1), No.664, 23/24, Hosur Main Road, Begur, Bengaluru. Bengaluru-560 068. Pan : Aaach 1072 Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, Ca Revenue By : Shri. V. S. Chakrapani, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 20.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2022 O R D E R Per N V Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri. V. S. Chakrapani, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92Section 92(1)Section 92B(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.252/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Mindteck India Ltd., Vs. DCIT, A.M.R. Tech Park, Block 1, 3rd Floor, Circle – 4(1)(1), No.664, 23/24, Hosur Main Road, Begur, Bengaluru. Bengaluru-560 068. PAN : AAACH 1072 Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Padam Chand Khincha, CA Revenue by : Shri. V. S. Chakrapani, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 20.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 27.06.2022 O R D E R Per N V Vasudevan, Vice President This appe…

DCIT, Circle- 6(1), New Delhi vs. Mdeverywhere India Pvt. Ltd., Noida

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3967/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: R.K. Panda & Shri Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Tiwari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mrinal Kr. Das, Sr. DR

Section 144C(2)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “I-1”: DELHI BEFORE R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.3840/Del./2018 Assessment Year 2010-2011 MD Everywhere India (P) The DCIT, Circle-6(1), Limited, C-53, Sector-58, Room No.318, Central Noida, Uttar Pradesh vs. Revenue Building, I.P. PIN – 201 301 Estate, New Delhi. PAN AAECM2671G PIN – 110 002 (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA.No.3967/Del./2018 Assessment Year 2010-2011 The DCIT, Circle-6(1), MD Everywhere India (P) Room No.318, Central Limited, C-53, Sector-58, Revenue Building, I.P. vs. Noida, Uttar Pradesh E…

Mdeverywhere India Pvt. Ltd., Noida vs. DCIT, Circle- 6(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3840/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: R.K. Panda & Shri Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Tiwari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mrinal Kr. Das, Sr. DR

Section 144C(2)Section 92C